2006•Unpublished venueRequires access

Designing for the pedestrian's inner-economist: optimising efficiency and experience in the suburbs and the CBD

Nina Creedman

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Walking’s attractiveness is dependent on the physical environment of the area in question, and, as this paper argues, the potential efficiency and experiential quality of a pedestrian trip. Pedestrian efficiency and experience can be explored through the presence (or lack) of several elements, all of which impact on a person’s decision to make the trip by foot. This paper will examine the impact of the following: density of formal pedestrian crossings; potential for informal crossings (e.g. jaywalking) via signal progression, phasing, and physical infrastructure; traffic signal cycles and phasing; route network density (i.e. number of route options between point A and B); and the pedestrian’s perception of trip time, as affected by urban design and quality of pedestrian environment. This paper draws upon project experience, research, and data collection from across New Zealand to illustrate how pedestrian-efficient (or inefficient) design can impact actual mode selection choice. The paper articulates many obvious-yet-overlooked urban design and transport infrastructure tools for optimising pedestrian efficiency and experience in the suburbs and the central business district, with the hopes of winning over the prospective pedestrian’s inner economist to choose walking as a viable, and optimal, transport option. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E215407.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Walking’s attractiveness is dependent on the physical environment of the area in question, and, as this paper argues, the potential efficiency and experiential quality of a pedestrian trip. Pedestrian efficiency and experience can be explored through the presence (or lack) of several elements, all of which impact on a person’s decision to make the trip by foot. This paper will examine the impact of the following: density of formal pedestrian crossings; potential for informal crossings (e.g. jaywalking) via signal progression, phasing, and physical infrastructure; traffic signal cycles and phasing; route network density (i.e. number of route options between point A and B); and the pedestrian’s perception of trip time, as affected by urban design and quality of pedestrian environment. This paper draws upon project experience, research, and data collection from across New Zealand to illustrate how pedestrian-efficient (or inefficient) design can impact actual mode selection choice. The paper articulates many obvious-yet-overlooked urban design and transport infrastructure tools for optimising pedestrian efficiency and experience in the suburbs and the central business district, with the hopes of winning over the prospective pedestrian’s inner economist to choose walking as a viable, and optimal, transport option. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E215407.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Walking’s attractiveness is dependent on the physical environment of the area in question, and, as this paper argues, the potential efficiency and experiential quality of a pedestrian trip. Pedestrian efficiency and experience can be explored through the presence (or lack) of several elements, all of which impact on a person’s decision to make the trip by foot. This paper will examine the impact of the following: density of formal pedestrian crossings; potential for informal crossings (e.g. jaywalking) via signal progression, phasing, and physical infrastructure; traffic signal cycles and phasing; route network density (i.e. number of route options between point A and B); and the pedestrian’s perception of trip time, as affected by urban design and quality of pedestrian environment. This paper draws upon project experience, research, and data collection from across New Zealand to illustrate how pedestrian-efficient (or inefficient) design can impact actual mode selection choice. The paper articulates many obvious-yet-overlooked urban design and transport infrastructure tools for optimising pedestrian efficiency and experience in the suburbs and the central business district, with the hopes of winning over the prospective pedestrian’s inner economist to choose walking as a viable, and optimal, transport option. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E215407.

Key concepts: Pedestrian, Transport engineering, Quality (philosophy), Pedestrian crossing, Mode choice, Perception, Point (geometry), Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Designing for the pedestrian's inner-economist: optimising efficiency and experience in the suburbs and the CBD — Research Paper | ScholarLens