2003Unpublished venueRequires access

Rural Highway Median Treatments

J L Gattis, Ramasubramaniyan Balakumar, Lynette K. Duncan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the safety records of different rural and suburban highway (other than fully-controlled access roadways) cross-section alternatives in Arkansas. This study attempted to assess the safety effects of the lack of or inclusion of various median types. Various databases were examined to identify those roadway segments having four or more lanes and posted speeds of 40 mph or above. When entering an urban area, the segments were normally terminated when the first traffic signal or stop sign was encountered. Crash data from three years were used. The analyses produced a number of relationships relating crash frequency to median, shoulder, volume, and access frequency attributes. Crash severity and crash type were also examined. The roadways with depressed medians and shoulders had the lowest crash rates, while the roadways with no median (i.e., painted line) and no shoulder had the worst safety record.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The objective of this study was to examine the safety records of different rural and suburban highway (other than fully-controlled access roadways) cross-section alternatives in Arkansas. This study attempted to assess the safety effects of the lack of or inclusion of various median types. Various databases were examined to identify those roadway segments having four or more lanes and posted speeds of 40 mph or above. When entering an urban area, the segments were normally terminated when the first traffic signal or stop sign was encountered. Crash data from three years were used. The analyses produced a number of relationships relating crash frequency to median, shoulder, volume, and access frequency attributes. Crash severity and crash type were also examined. The roadways with depressed medians and shoulders had the lowest crash rates, while the roadways with no median (i.e., painted line) and no shoulder had the worst safety record.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the safety records of different rural and suburban highway (other than fully-controlled access roadways) cross-section alternatives in Arkansas. This study attempted to assess the safety effects of the lack of or inclusion of various median types. Various databases were examined to identify those roadway segments having four or more lanes and posted speeds of 40 mph or above. When entering an urban area, the segments were normally terminated when the first traffic signal or stop sign was encountered. Crash data from three years were used. The analyses produced a number of relationships relating crash frequency to median, shoulder, volume, and access frequency attributes. Crash severity and crash type were also examined. The roadways with depressed medians and shoulders had the lowest crash rates, while the roadways with no median (i.e., painted line) and no shoulder had the worst safety record.

Key concepts: Crash, Median, Traffic volume, Shoulders, Transport engineering, Geography, Poison control, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rural Highway Median Treatments — Research Paper | ScholarLens