1974National Cooperative Highway Research Program reportRequires access

RECOMMENDED PROCEDURES FOR VEHICLE CRASH TESTING OF HIGHWAY APPURTENANCES

M E Bronstad, J D Michie

Open publisher page 31 citations

Abstract

This report which is a synthesis of existing information on barrier technology, test methods, and human tolerance, recommends procedures for conducting passenger vehicle crash tests of roadside appurtenances (longitudinal barries such as bridges rails, guardrails, median barriers, transitions and terminals; crash cushions; and breakaway or yielding supports for signs and luminaires), and provides a commentary on these procedures. The procedures (devised to subject the appurtenances to severe conditions rather than to typical highway situations) which aim to promote uniform testing of such appurtenances, are directed to test only the safety or dynamic performance. Three appraisal factors are considered: (a) structural adequacy, (b) impact severity, and (c) vehicle trajectory hazard. Depending on the specific appurtenance function, it should contain, redirect, and/or permit penetration of impacting vehicle in a predictable manner to satisfy structural adequacy requirements. Impact severity relates to the degree of hazard to which the occupants of the impacting vehicle would be subjected and is measured in terms of vehicle accelerations and momentum changes. Vehicle trajectory hazard relates to the probable involvement of other traffic because of the postcrash path or position of the impacting car. Details are given of the testing facility, the test article, vehicle, and test conditions. The data acquisition systems and performance evaluation are detailed. Definitions are presented of the longitudinal traffic barriers, crash cushions and breakaway or yielding supports, and comments are made (on the testing facility, highway appurtenance, vehicle, test conditions, data acquisition systems, performance evaluation and report) which provide an insight into the rationale used in arriving at the recommendations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This report which is a synthesis of existing information on barrier technology, test methods, and human tolerance, recommends procedures for conducting passenger vehicle crash tests of roadside appurtenances (longitudinal barries such as bridges rails, guardrails, median barriers, transitions and terminals; crash cushions; and breakaway or yielding supports for signs and luminaires), and provides a commentary on these procedures. The procedures (devised to subject the appurtenances to severe conditions rather than to typical highway situations) which aim to promote uniform testing of such appurtenances, are directed to test only the safety or dynamic performance. Three appraisal factors are considered: (a) structural adequacy, (b) impact severity, and (c) vehicle trajectory hazard. Depending on the specific appurtenance function, it should contain, redirect, and/or permit penetration of impacting vehicle in a predictable manner to satisfy structural adequacy requirements. Impact severity relates to the degree of hazard to which the occupants of the impacting vehicle would be subjected and is measured in terms of vehicle accelerations and momentum changes. Vehicle trajectory hazard relates to the probable involvement of other traffic because of the postcrash path or position of the impacting car. Details are given of the testing facility, the test article, vehicle, and test conditions. The data acquisition systems and performance evaluation are detailed. Definitions are presented of the longitudinal traffic barriers, crash cushions and breakaway or yielding supports, and comments are made (on the testing facility, highway appurtenance, vehicle, test conditions, data acquisition systems, performance evaluation and report) which provide an insight into the rationale used in arriving at the recommendations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 31 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This report which is a synthesis of existing information on barrier technology, test methods, and human tolerance, recommends procedures for conducting passenger vehicle crash tests of roadside appurtenances (longitudinal barries such as bridges rails, guardrails, median barriers, transitions and terminals; crash cushions; and breakaway or yielding supports for signs and luminaires), and provides a commentary on these procedures. The procedures (devised to subject the appurtenances to severe conditions rather than to typical highway situations) which aim to promote uniform testing of such appurtenances, are directed to test only the safety or dynamic performance. Three appraisal factors are considered: (a) structural adequacy, (b) impact severity, and (c) vehicle trajectory hazard. Depending on the specific appurtenance function, it should contain, redirect, and/or permit penetration of impacting vehicle in a predictable manner to satisfy structural adequacy requirements. Impact severity relates to the degree of hazard to which the occupants of the impacting vehicle would be subjected and is measured in terms of vehicle accelerations and momentum changes. Vehicle trajectory hazard relates to the probable involvement of other traffic because of the postcrash path or position of the impacting car. Details are given of the testing facility, the test article, vehicle, and test conditions. The data acquisition systems and performance evaluation are detailed. Definitions are presented of the longitudinal traffic barriers, crash cushions and breakaway or yielding supports, and comments are made (on the testing facility, highway appurtenance, vehicle, test conditions, data acquisition systems, performance evaluation and report) which provide an insight into the rationale used in arriving at the recommendations.

Key concepts: Crash, Crash test, Engineering, Hazard, Forensic engineering, Computer science, Programming language, Organic chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
RECOMMENDED PROCEDURES FOR VEHICLE CRASH TESTING OF HIGHWAY APPURTENANCES — Research Paper | ScholarLens