2008•Transport Research ForumRequires access

International comparison of road infrastructure investment

Nicola Hay

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

It has been argued that transport infrastructure in New Zealand is consistently under-funded and is restricting economic growth arising from gains in productivity. This paper compares recent investment levels and funding mechanisms for road infrastructure in New Zealand with those in Ireland and Norway. The findings are that New Zealand road transport investment is comparable in relation to other countries, while the available information suggests the road transport network is performing well. In the light of this and other evidence, it is suggested that there are questions over whether the level of investment in transport infrastructure is restricting economic growth in New Zealand. The discussion identifies a number of issues, which are likely to impact upon the outcomes of road infrastructure investment. The first section briefly reviews the significance of transport infrastructure investment and policy. Section 3 compares international data on transport investment and makes other relevant comparisons. Section 3 also includes an investigation of similarities and differences between New Zealand, Ireland and Norway. Section 4 sets out some conclusions based on the evidence. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E217541.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It has been argued that transport infrastructure in New Zealand is consistently under-funded and is restricting economic growth arising from gains in productivity. This paper compares recent investment levels and funding mechanisms for road infrastructure in New Zealand with those in Ireland and Norway. The findings are that New Zealand road transport investment is comparable in relation to other countries, while the available information suggests the road transport network is performing well. In the light of this and other evidence, it is suggested that there are questions over whether the level of investment in transport infrastructure is restricting economic growth in New Zealand. The discussion identifies a number of issues, which are likely to impact upon the outcomes of road infrastructure investment. The first section briefly reviews the significance of transport infrastructure investment and policy. Section 3 compares international data on transport investment and makes other relevant comparisons. Section 3 also includes an investigation of similarities and differences between New Zealand, Ireland and Norway. Section 4 sets out some conclusions based on the evidence. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E217541.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It has been argued that transport infrastructure in New Zealand is consistently under-funded and is restricting economic growth arising from gains in productivity. This paper compares recent investment levels and funding mechanisms for road infrastructure in New Zealand with those in Ireland and Norway. The findings are that New Zealand road transport investment is comparable in relation to other countries, while the available information suggests the road transport network is performing well. In the light of this and other evidence, it is suggested that there are questions over whether the level of investment in transport infrastructure is restricting economic growth in New Zealand. The discussion identifies a number of issues, which are likely to impact upon the outcomes of road infrastructure investment. The first section briefly reviews the significance of transport infrastructure investment and policy. Section 3 compares international data on transport investment and makes other relevant comparisons. Section 3 also includes an investigation of similarities and differences between New Zealand, Ireland and Norway. Section 4 sets out some conclusions based on the evidence. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E217541.

Key concepts: Investment (military), Transport infrastructure, Productivity, Section (typography), Business, Transport engineering, Transport network, Regional science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
International comparison of road infrastructure investment — Research Paper | ScholarLens