2001•Sweet & Maxwell eBooksRequires access

Restitution : its division and ordering

Steve Hedley

Open publisher page 61 citations

Abstract

Unjust enrichment in world perspective. The fragmentation of restitutionary theory. The myth of mistake. Contract, exchange and restitution. The implied contract fallacy fallacy. Indirect enrichment. Wrongs and their remedies. The aim of restitutionary remedies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Unjust enrichment in world perspective. The fragmentation of restitutionary theory. The myth of mistake. Contract, exchange and restitution. The implied contract fallacy fallacy. Indirect enrichment. Wrongs and their remedies. The aim of restitutionary remedies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 61 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Unjust enrichment in world perspective. The fragmentation of restitutionary theory. The myth of mistake. Contract, exchange and restitution. The implied contract fallacy fallacy. Indirect enrichment. Wrongs and their remedies. The aim of restitutionary remedies.

Key concepts: Restitution, Unjust enrichment, Fallacy, Mistake, Philosophy, Law, Law and economics, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Restitution : its division and ordering — Research Paper | ScholarLens