2007•Medical Entomology and ZoologyRequires access

Politeness in Presidential Debates: Shaping Political Face in Campaign Debates from 1960 to 2004

Edward A. Hinck, Shelly S Hinck, William O. Dailey

Open publisher page 30 citations

Abstract

Part 1 I: POLITENESS THEORY AND THE STUDY OF CAMPAIGN DEBATES Chapter 2 1 Introduction: Politeness and Political Image in Campaign Debates Chapter 3 2 Politeness in Presidential Campaign Debates: An Overview Chapter 4 3 Vice Presidential Debates Part 5 II: THE ROLE OF POLITENESS IN CAMPAIGN OUTCOMES Chapter 6 4 Debating Policies: The 1960, 1976, and 1980 Campaigns Chapter 7 5 The 1992 and 2000 Presidential Debates Chapter 8 6 Directly Attacking the Opponent: The 1984, 1988, 1996, and 2004 Presidential Debates Part 9 III: IMPLICATIONS FOR DEBATE PLANNERS, POLITICIANS, CITIZENS, AND SCHOLARS Chapter 10 7 Debate Formats and Politeness Chapter 11 8 Politeness, Debates, and Campaign Outcomes Chapter 12 9 An Ideal Debate for the Electorate Chapter 13 10 Conclusions and Recommendations for Future Research Chapter 14 Appendix A: Coding Politeness: Units and Schema Chapter 15 Appendix B: Politeness Schema Chapter 16 References

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Part 1 I: POLITENESS THEORY AND THE STUDY OF CAMPAIGN DEBATES Chapter 2 1 Introduction: Politeness and Political Image in Campaign Debates Chapter 3 2 Politeness in Presidential Campaign Debates: An Overview Chapter 4 3 Vice Presidential Debates Part 5 II: THE ROLE OF POLITENESS IN CAMPAIGN OUTCOMES Chapter 6 4 Debating Policies: The 1960, 1976, and 1980 Campaigns Chapter 7 5 The 1992 and 2000 Presidential Debates Chapter 8 6 Directly Attacking the Opponent: The 1984, 1988, 1996, and 2004 Presidential Debates Part 9 III: IMPLICATIONS FOR DEBATE PLANNERS, POLITICIANS, CITIZENS, AND SCHOLARS Chapter 10 7 Debate Formats and Politeness Chapter 11 8 Politeness, Debates, and Campaign Outcomes Chapter 12 9 An Ideal Debate for the Electorate Chapter 13 10 Conclusions and Recommendations for Future Research Chapter 14 Appendix A: Coding Politeness: Units and Schema Chapter 15 Appendix B: Politeness Schema Chapter 16 References

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 30 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Part 1 I: POLITENESS THEORY AND THE STUDY OF CAMPAIGN DEBATES Chapter 2 1 Introduction: Politeness and Political Image in Campaign Debates Chapter 3 2 Politeness in Presidential Campaign Debates: An Overview Chapter 4 3 Vice Presidential Debates Part 5 II: THE ROLE OF POLITENESS IN CAMPAIGN OUTCOMES Chapter 6 4 Debating Policies: The 1960, 1976, and 1980 Campaigns Chapter 7 5 The 1992 and 2000 Presidential Debates Chapter 8 6 Directly Attacking the Opponent: The 1984, 1988, 1996, and 2004 Presidential Debates Part 9 III: IMPLICATIONS FOR DEBATE PLANNERS, POLITICIANS, CITIZENS, AND SCHOLARS Chapter 10 7 Debate Formats and Politeness Chapter 11 8 Politeness, Debates, and Campaign Outcomes Chapter 12 9 An Ideal Debate for the Electorate Chapter 13 10 Conclusions and Recommendations for Future Research Chapter 14 Appendix A: Coding Politeness: Units and Schema Chapter 15 Appendix B: Politeness Schema Chapter 16 References

Key concepts: Politeness, Presidential system, Political science, Politeness theory, Politics, Schema (genetic algorithms), Media studies, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Politeness in Presidential Debates: Shaping Political Face in Campaign Debates from 1960 to 2004 — Research Paper | ScholarLens