2015•International Journal of Foundations of Computer ScienceOpen access

Separating the Classes of Recursively Enumerable Languages Based on Machine Size

Jan Van Leeuwen, Jiřı́ Wiedermann

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

In the late nineteen sixties it was observed that the r.e. languages form an infinite proper hierarchy [Formula: see text] based on the size of the Turing machines that accept them. We examine the fundamental position of the finite languages and their complements in the hierarchy. We show that for every finite language L one has that L, [Formula: see text] for some [Formula: see text] where m is the length of the longest word in L, c is the cardinality of L, and [Formula: see text]. If [Formula: see text], then [Formula: see text] for some [Formula: see text]. We also prove that for every n, there is a finite language Ln with [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] but Ln, [Formula: see text] for some [Formula: see text]. Several further results are shown that how the hierarchy can be separated by increasing chains of finite languages. The proofs make use of several auxiliary results for Turing machines with advice.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the late nineteen sixties it was observed that the r.e. languages form an infinite proper hierarchy [Formula: see text] based on the size of the Turing machines that accept them. We examine the fundamental position of the finite languages and their complements in the hierarchy. We show that for every finite language L one has that L, [Formula: see text] for some [Formula: see text] where m is the length of the longest word in L, c is the cardinality of L, and [Formula: see text]. If [Formula: see text], then [Formula: see text] for some [Formula: see text]. We also prove that for every n, there is a finite language Ln with [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] but Ln, [Formula: see text] for some [Formula: see text]. Several further results are shown that how the hierarchy can be separated by increasing chains of finite languages. The proofs make use of several auxiliary results for Turing machines with advice.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the late nineteen sixties it was observed that the r.e. languages form an infinite proper hierarchy [Formula: see text] based on the size of the Turing machines that accept them. We examine the fundamental position of the finite languages and their complements in the hierarchy. We show that for every finite language L one has that L, [Formula: see text] for some [Formula: see text] where m is the length of the longest word in L, c is the cardinality of L, and [Formula: see text]. If [Formula: see text], then [Formula: see text] for some [Formula: see text]. We also prove that for every n, there is a finite language Ln with [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] but Ln, [Formula: see text] for some [Formula: see text]. Several further results are shown that how the hierarchy can be separated by increasing chains of finite languages. The proofs make use of several auxiliary results for Turing machines with advice.

Key concepts: Recursively enumerable language, Chomsky hierarchy, Hierarchy, Turing machine, Abstract family of languages, Computer science, Formal language, Recursively enumerable set

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Separating the Classes of Recursively Enumerable Languages Based on Machine Size — Research Paper | ScholarLens