Keynes versus Kalecki: Responses to Lopez and Kriesler
Paul Davidson
Abstract
Paul Davidson
Abstract
:López and Kriesler have argued that Kalecki not only discovered the principle of effective demand independently of Keynes, but in Kalecki’s theory of price, distribution, investment, and money andfinance is superior to Keynes’s General Theory. These claims of superiority may hold against Old (neoclassical synthesis) and New Keynesian macrotheories. This paper explicates why Keynes, however, is clearly superior not only to Kalecki, but also to Old and New Keynesian analysis. The advantages of Keynes’s General Theory analysis of price and distribution, investment, and money and finance are explained.
OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
:López and Kriesler have argued that Kalecki not only discovered the principle of effective demand independently of Keynes, but in Kalecki’s theory of price, distribution, investment, and money andfinance is superior to Keynes’s General Theory. These claims of superiority may hold against Old (neoclassical synthesis) and New Keynesian macrotheories. This paper explicates why Keynes, however, is clearly superior not only to Kalecki, but also to Old and New Keynesian analysis. The advantages of Keynes’s General Theory analysis of price and distribution, investment, and money and finance are explained.
Key concepts: Economics, Post-Keynesian economics, Keynesian economics, Effective demand, Investment (military), General theory, Neoclassical economics, Macroeconomics