2002Journal of Post Keynesian EconomicsRequires access

Keynes versus Kalecki: Responses to Lopez and Kriesler

Paul Davidson

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

:López and Kriesler have argued that Kalecki not only discovered the principle of effective demand independently of Keynes, but in Kalecki’s theory of price, distribution, investment, and money andfinance is superior to Keynes’s General Theory. These claims of superiority may hold against Old (neoclassical synthesis) and New Keynesian macrotheories. This paper explicates why Keynes, however, is clearly superior not only to Kalecki, but also to Old and New Keynesian analysis. The advantages of Keynes’s General Theory analysis of price and distribution, investment, and money and finance are explained.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

:López and Kriesler have argued that Kalecki not only discovered the principle of effective demand independently of Keynes, but in Kalecki’s theory of price, distribution, investment, and money andfinance is superior to Keynes’s General Theory. These claims of superiority may hold against Old (neoclassical synthesis) and New Keynesian macrotheories. This paper explicates why Keynes, however, is clearly superior not only to Kalecki, but also to Old and New Keynesian analysis. The advantages of Keynes’s General Theory analysis of price and distribution, investment, and money and finance are explained.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

:López and Kriesler have argued that Kalecki not only discovered the principle of effective demand independently of Keynes, but in Kalecki’s theory of price, distribution, investment, and money andfinance is superior to Keynes’s General Theory. These claims of superiority may hold against Old (neoclassical synthesis) and New Keynesian macrotheories. This paper explicates why Keynes, however, is clearly superior not only to Kalecki, but also to Old and New Keynesian analysis. The advantages of Keynes’s General Theory analysis of price and distribution, investment, and money and finance are explained.

Key concepts: Economics, Post-Keynesian economics, Keynesian economics, Effective demand, Investment (military), General theory, Neoclassical economics, Macroeconomics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Keynes versus Kalecki: Responses to Lopez and Kriesler — Research Paper | ScholarLens