2006Unpublished venueRequires access

Biofuels: birth of the second generation

Alec M. Marshall

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Many companies are investing in biofuel production and the UK is likely to meet its target for biofuels to make up 5% of fuel supplies by 2010 through domestic production. However the environmental benefits of first-generation biofuels have been questioned. There have been calls for a biofuels certification scheme to guarantee they produce carbon savings. The amount of agricultural land needed to produce first-generation biofuels would be too high on a large scale. Second-generation biofuels are made using cellulose rich, non-food crops such as straw or wood chips or energy crops such as miscanthus and switchgrass. These second-generation biofuels have the potential for reducing transport carbon dioxide emissions. A table is presented of companies investing in the production of second-generation biofuels (biodiesel and bioethanol). The costs of producing biofuels are discussed. Political support for the production of biofuels in the USA, UK and EU is considered.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Many companies are investing in biofuel production and the UK is likely to meet its target for biofuels to make up 5% of fuel supplies by 2010 through domestic production. However the environmental benefits of first-generation biofuels have been questioned. There have been calls for a biofuels certification scheme to guarantee they produce carbon savings. The amount of agricultural land needed to produce first-generation biofuels would be too high on a large scale. Second-generation biofuels are made using cellulose rich, non-food crops such as straw or wood chips or energy crops such as miscanthus and switchgrass. These second-generation biofuels have the potential for reducing transport carbon dioxide emissions. A table is presented of companies investing in the production of second-generation biofuels (biodiesel and bioethanol). The costs of producing biofuels are discussed. Political support for the production of biofuels in the USA, UK and EU is considered.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Many companies are investing in biofuel production and the UK is likely to meet its target for biofuels to make up 5% of fuel supplies by 2010 through domestic production. However the environmental benefits of first-generation biofuels have been questioned. There have been calls for a biofuels certification scheme to guarantee they produce carbon savings. The amount of agricultural land needed to produce first-generation biofuels would be too high on a large scale. Second-generation biofuels are made using cellulose rich, non-food crops such as straw or wood chips or energy crops such as miscanthus and switchgrass. These second-generation biofuels have the potential for reducing transport carbon dioxide emissions. A table is presented of companies investing in the production of second-generation biofuels (biodiesel and bioethanol). The costs of producing biofuels are discussed. Political support for the production of biofuels in the USA, UK and EU is considered.

Key concepts: Biofuel, Aviation biofuel, Production (economics), Biodiesel, Renewable energy, Greenhouse gas, Bioenergy, Miscanthus

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Biofuels: birth of the second generation — Research Paper | ScholarLens