Constitutional Fair Use
Michael D. Brittin
Abstract
Open-access reader
Michael D. Brittin
Abstract
Open-access reader
A law imposing a limited restraint on speech is not necessarily unconstitutional.The first amendment does not give absolute protection to every utterance; 7 its reference to "no law" has not been interpreted literally.'Significant, though diminishing, limitations on the freedom of expression remain 9 because some expressions con-* The original draft of this paper won the 1978 Nathan Burkan Competition at the Marshall-Wythe School of Law, the College of William and Mary. 1.U.S. CoNsT.amend.I. 2. U.S. CONST.art.I, § 8, c. 8.The clause, in its entirety, gives Congress the power "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A law imposing a limited restraint on speech is not necessarily unconstitutional.The first amendment does not give absolute protection to every utterance; 7 its reference to "no law" has not been interpreted literally.'Significant, though diminishing, limitations on the freedom of expression remain 9 because some expressions con-* The original draft of this paper won the 1978 Nathan Burkan Competition at the Marshall-Wythe School of Law, the College of William and Mary. 1.U.S. CoNsT.amend.I. 2. U.S. CONST.art.I, § 8, c. 8.The clause, in its entirety, gives Congress the power "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the
Key concepts: Law, Constitutional law, Political science