1978•The William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository (William & Mary)Open access

Constitutional Fair Use

Michael D. Brittin

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

A law imposing a limited restraint on speech is not necessarily unconstitutional.The first amendment does not give absolute protection to every utterance; 7 its reference to "no law" has not been interpreted literally.'Significant, though diminishing, limitations on the freedom of expression remain 9 because some expressions con-* The original draft of this paper won the 1978 Nathan Burkan Competition at the Marshall-Wythe School of Law, the College of William and Mary. 1.U.S. CoNsT.amend.I. 2. U.S. CONST.art.I, § 8, c. 8.The clause, in its entirety, gives Congress the power "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A law imposing a limited restraint on speech is not necessarily unconstitutional.The first amendment does not give absolute protection to every utterance; 7 its reference to "no law" has not been interpreted literally.'Significant, though diminishing, limitations on the freedom of expression remain 9 because some expressions con-* The original draft of this paper won the 1978 Nathan Burkan Competition at the Marshall-Wythe School of Law, the College of William and Mary. 1.U.S. CoNsT.amend.I. 2. U.S. CONST.art.I, § 8, c. 8.The clause, in its entirety, gives Congress the power "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A law imposing a limited restraint on speech is not necessarily unconstitutional.The first amendment does not give absolute protection to every utterance; 7 its reference to "no law" has not been interpreted literally.'Significant, though diminishing, limitations on the freedom of expression remain 9 because some expressions con-* The original draft of this paper won the 1978 Nathan Burkan Competition at the Marshall-Wythe School of Law, the College of William and Mary. 1.U.S. CoNsT.amend.I. 2. U.S. CONST.art.I, § 8, c. 8.The clause, in its entirety, gives Congress the power "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the

Key concepts: Law, Constitutional law, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Constitutional Fair Use — Research Paper | ScholarLens