2008Unpublished venueRequires access

What factors actually affect crash severity and how can road safety programs be better targeted

S Levett, D Saffron, Jiajun Tang, Soames Job

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a methodology that would better focus scarce road safety resources to fix those areas of the road network that have the greatest number of fatal and serious injury crashes. Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is used to prioritise black spot projects with the economic benefit of a remedial treatment being the difference between predicted costs of crashes with and without the proposed treatment. This was found to have practical implications for improving the prioritisation of road safety crash reduction programs. Categories of crashes were identified, based on differences in average severity and their relevance to possible treatments. The analysis demonstrates the higher priority of projects that address more severe crashes when crash values are determined using: 1. RUM codes rather than DCA codes to include run-off-road on bend crash type codes that indicate the side of the road which the vehicle went off; 2. three speed limit groups rather than two; 3. darkness as against daylight; 4. the area of the State where the crashes are located; 5. whether the crash happened at an intersection or on a freeway/motorway; 6. different types of safety barrier; 7. size of curve radius. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E217612.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The aim of this study was to develop a methodology that would better focus scarce road safety resources to fix those areas of the road network that have the greatest number of fatal and serious injury crashes. Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is used to prioritise black spot projects with the economic benefit of a remedial treatment being the difference between predicted costs of crashes with and without the proposed treatment. This was found to have practical implications for improving the prioritisation of road safety crash reduction programs. Categories of crashes were identified, based on differences in average severity and their relevance to possible treatments. The analysis demonstrates the higher priority of projects that address more severe crashes when crash values are determined using: 1. RUM codes rather than DCA codes to include run-off-road on bend crash type codes that indicate the side of the road which the vehicle went off; 2. three speed limit groups rather than two; 3. darkness as against daylight; 4. the area of the State where the crashes are located; 5. whether the crash happened at an intersection or on a freeway/motorway; 6. different types of safety barrier; 7. size of curve radius. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E217612.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a methodology that would better focus scarce road safety resources to fix those areas of the road network that have the greatest number of fatal and serious injury crashes. Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is used to prioritise black spot projects with the economic benefit of a remedial treatment being the difference between predicted costs of crashes with and without the proposed treatment. This was found to have practical implications for improving the prioritisation of road safety crash reduction programs. Categories of crashes were identified, based on differences in average severity and their relevance to possible treatments. The analysis demonstrates the higher priority of projects that address more severe crashes when crash values are determined using: 1. RUM codes rather than DCA codes to include run-off-road on bend crash type codes that indicate the side of the road which the vehicle went off; 2. three speed limit groups rather than two; 3. darkness as against daylight; 4. the area of the State where the crashes are located; 5. whether the crash happened at an intersection or on a freeway/motorway; 6. different types of safety barrier; 7. size of curve radius. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see ITRD abstract no. E217612.

Key concepts: Crash, Transport engineering, Intersection (aeronautics), Speed limit, Engineering, Black spot, Traffic volume, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
What factors actually affect crash severity and how can road safety programs be better targeted — Research Paper | ScholarLens