COMPARING AIRPORT GROUND ACCESS: A TRANSATLANTIC LOOK AT AN INTERMODAL ISSUE
Matthew A Coogan
Abstract
Matthew A Coogan
Abstract
This article examines airport ground access, with specific interest in the following areas: trends in U.S. ground access patterns; use of rail in Europe; components of successful European rail ground access services; users of successful rail services; comparison of airport ground access services in San Francisco and in Zurich; categorizing airport access systems; and a better way to look at airport access. In conclusion, it is stated that U.S. airport ground access planners should work to bring their systems to overall mode shares above 30%, to emulate the ridership levels attained by the most completely interconnected systems in Europe.
OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article examines airport ground access, with specific interest in the following areas: trends in U.S. ground access patterns; use of rail in Europe; components of successful European rail ground access services; users of successful rail services; comparison of airport ground access services in San Francisco and in Zurich; categorizing airport access systems; and a better way to look at airport access. In conclusion, it is stated that U.S. airport ground access planners should work to bring their systems to overall mode shares above 30%, to emulate the ridership levels attained by the most completely interconnected systems in Europe.
Key concepts: Ground transportation, Transport engineering, Work (physics), International airport, Telecommunications, Business, Engineering, Mechanical engineering