1994•Unpublished venueRequires access

KEY ISSUES IN DEMAND MANAGEMENT

Peter Charles Goodwin

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This paper presents some principles of demand management, and discusses some unresolved questions. In April 1989, the Department of Transport (DTp) issued revised traffic forecasts, to assess future demands for road capacity. They were discussed intensively by conferences, committees and working groups of almost all professional organisations involved in transport. The discussions' conclusions included: (1) a new consensus on the need for demand management for urban areas; (2) some elements of a new policy for rural areas; (3) identification of still unresolved issues in inter-urban road policy. Some tools and principles of successful demand management are stated. Relevant questions are: (1) whether roads can continue to be regarded as a public good; (2) what evaluation techniques should be used to appraise demand management strategy; (3) how to gain public acceptance of a locally applied demand management strategy; (4) the problem of 'induced traffic' in assessing road capacity. Three alternative policy scenarios are outlined: (1) priority for trunk road traffic; (2) 'let the market decide'; (3) priority for local conditions. Demand management problems can give rise to certain problems, especially when they are not implemented as an integrated total approach, but applied piecemeal. For example, some possible unintended side-effects are indicated for policies relating to commuting, pedestrianisation, park-and-ride, green belts, and road pricing. For the covering abstract see IRRD 866140.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents some principles of demand management, and discusses some unresolved questions. In April 1989, the Department of Transport (DTp) issued revised traffic forecasts, to assess future demands for road capacity. They were discussed intensively by conferences, committees and working groups of almost all professional organisations involved in transport. The discussions' conclusions included: (1) a new consensus on the need for demand management for urban areas; (2) some elements of a new policy for rural areas; (3) identification of still unresolved issues in inter-urban road policy. Some tools and principles of successful demand management are stated. Relevant questions are: (1) whether roads can continue to be regarded as a public good; (2) what evaluation techniques should be used to appraise demand management strategy; (3) how to gain public acceptance of a locally applied demand management strategy; (4) the problem of 'induced traffic' in assessing road capacity. Three alternative policy scenarios are outlined: (1) priority for trunk road traffic; (2) 'let the market decide'; (3) priority for local conditions. Demand management problems can give rise to certain problems, especially when they are not implemented as an integrated total approach, but applied piecemeal. For example, some possible unintended side-effects are indicated for policies relating to commuting, pedestrianisation, park-and-ride, green belts, and road pricing. For the covering abstract see IRRD 866140.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents some principles of demand management, and discusses some unresolved questions. In April 1989, the Department of Transport (DTp) issued revised traffic forecasts, to assess future demands for road capacity. They were discussed intensively by conferences, committees and working groups of almost all professional organisations involved in transport. The discussions' conclusions included: (1) a new consensus on the need for demand management for urban areas; (2) some elements of a new policy for rural areas; (3) identification of still unresolved issues in inter-urban road policy. Some tools and principles of successful demand management are stated. Relevant questions are: (1) whether roads can continue to be regarded as a public good; (2) what evaluation techniques should be used to appraise demand management strategy; (3) how to gain public acceptance of a locally applied demand management strategy; (4) the problem of 'induced traffic' in assessing road capacity. Three alternative policy scenarios are outlined: (1) priority for trunk road traffic; (2) 'let the market decide'; (3) priority for local conditions. Demand management problems can give rise to certain problems, especially when they are not implemented as an integrated total approach, but applied piecemeal. For example, some possible unintended side-effects are indicated for policies relating to commuting, pedestrianisation, park-and-ride, green belts, and road pricing. For the covering abstract see IRRD 866140.

Key concepts: Demand management, Unintended consequences, Identification (biology), Business, Public transport, Transport engineering, Key (lock), Environmental economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
KEY ISSUES IN DEMAND MANAGEMENT — Research Paper | ScholarLens