2002Bridge design & engineeringRequires access

SEAL OF APPROVAL

Mark J. Mutziger, Carl B. Osberg

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Expansion joints have always been a major source of problems for bridge owners, whatever type or size the joint, and it is advisable to eliminate them whenever possible. This trend of minimizing the number of expansion joints has led designers of large bridges to concentrate the movements at only a few locations with large movement range demands. For bridge movement ranges greater than 100 mm, the two primary alternative expansion joints are finger joints - also known as tooth joints - and modular bridge expansion joints. This article examines new test standards and specifications that will provide reliable and durable sealed joints for long span bridges.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Expansion joints have always been a major source of problems for bridge owners, whatever type or size the joint, and it is advisable to eliminate them whenever possible. This trend of minimizing the number of expansion joints has led designers of large bridges to concentrate the movements at only a few locations with large movement range demands. For bridge movement ranges greater than 100 mm, the two primary alternative expansion joints are finger joints - also known as tooth joints - and modular bridge expansion joints. This article examines new test standards and specifications that will provide reliable and durable sealed joints for long span bridges.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Expansion joints have always been a major source of problems for bridge owners, whatever type or size the joint, and it is advisable to eliminate them whenever possible. This trend of minimizing the number of expansion joints has led designers of large bridges to concentrate the movements at only a few locations with large movement range demands. For bridge movement ranges greater than 100 mm, the two primary alternative expansion joints are finger joints - also known as tooth joints - and modular bridge expansion joints. This article examines new test standards and specifications that will provide reliable and durable sealed joints for long span bridges.

Key concepts: Expansion joint, Bridge (graph theory), Joint (building), Engineering, Modular design, Seal (emblem), Structural engineering, Forensic engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
SEAL OF APPROVAL — Research Paper | ScholarLens