Are Benefits of Light Rail Worth Sacrifices of Foregone Bus Service
John Semmens
Abstract
John Semmens
Abstract
In 1945, use of public transit accounted for more than half of the urban travel done in the United States. By 2004, this figure had dropped to less than 3%, despite substantial government subsidies for public transit since the mid 1960s. In an effort to increase the percentage of urban travel on public transit, urban areas are often turning to light rail as an alternative to bus service. The author studies light rail efficiency and cost after analyzing operations in 19 of 20 cities with both light rail and bus service.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In 1945, use of public transit accounted for more than half of the urban travel done in the United States. By 2004, this figure had dropped to less than 3%, despite substantial government subsidies for public transit since the mid 1960s. In an effort to increase the percentage of urban travel on public transit, urban areas are often turning to light rail as an alternative to bus service. The author studies light rail efficiency and cost after analyzing operations in 19 of 20 cities with both light rail and bus service.
Key concepts: Subsidy, Public transport, Light rail, Light rail transit, Transport engineering, Service (business), Government (linguistics), Business