Diagnostic value of ECG patterns of right ventricular hypertrophy in children.
E B Fretz, Hans Rosenberg
Abstract
E B Fretz, Hans Rosenberg
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic value of traditional criteria of right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) in children. PATIENTS: The electrocardiograms (ECGs) of 1000 consecutive pediatric patients were reviewed. Children under three months old were excluded as were patients with QRS prolongation. RESULTS: Four hundred and thirty-four patients met all inclusion criteria. The medical records were then reviewed for diagnosis. Sixty-seven per cent had a diagnosis compatible with RVH. Of the ECG patterns evaluated, a precociously upright T wave in lead V1 was most predictive with 99% specificity. Presence of a QR complex in lead V1 had a 96% specificity but R:S ratio, voltage criteria and rSR' incomplete right bundle branch block pattern had intermediate specificities of 66%, 66% and 52%, respectively. Sensitivities of 12.6%, 13.2%, 34.0%, 63.3% and 74.2% were calculated for upright T, QR complex, R:S ratio, voltage criteria and rSR', respectively. CONCLUSIONS: An upright T wave or qR pattern are highly specific but insensitive markers of RVH in children. In contrast, when an incomplete right bundle branch block exists, the rSR' pattern is a relatively sensitive but nonspecific predictor of RVH.
OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic value of traditional criteria of right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) in children. PATIENTS: The electrocardiograms (ECGs) of 1000 consecutive pediatric patients were reviewed. Children under three months old were excluded as were patients with QRS prolongation. RESULTS: Four hundred and thirty-four patients met all inclusion criteria. The medical records were then reviewed for diagnosis. Sixty-seven per cent had a diagnosis compatible with RVH. Of the ECG patterns evaluated, a precociously upright T wave in lead V1 was most predictive with 99% specificity. Presence of a QR complex in lead V1 had a 96% specificity but R:S ratio, voltage criteria and rSR' incomplete right bundle branch block pattern had intermediate specificities of 66%, 66% and 52%, respectively. Sensitivities of 12.6%, 13.2%, 34.0%, 63.3% and 74.2% were calculated for upright T, QR complex, R:S ratio, voltage criteria and rSR', respectively. CONCLUSIONS: An upright T wave or qR pattern are highly specific but insensitive markers of RVH in children. In contrast, when an incomplete right bundle branch block exists, the rSR' pattern is a relatively sensitive but nonspecific predictor of RVH.
Key concepts: Medicine, Right ventricular hypertrophy, Right bundle branch block, Cardiology, QRS complex, Internal medicine, Left ventricular hypertrophy, Ventricular hypertrophy