2012Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparative analysis of enterprise architecture frameworks

Danica Oblak

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Today's enterprises are facing a competitive power in the dynamically changing business environment. With increasing complexity of enterprise, enterprise architecture have become an important field. Creating an enterprise architecture can be complex task, so enterprise architecture framework were created to simplify the process and guide an architect through all areas of architecture development. This study concentrates on the comparative analysis of enterprise architecture frameworks. There are numbers of already established enterprise architecture frameworks in use today. Enterprise architecture frameworks are necessary to capture the entire complexity of enterprise. Some of these frameworks were developed for specific areas, whereas others have broader functionality. None of the enterprise architecture frameworks is really complete. Each has its strengths and weaknesses. In this research, we provide a comparison of several classic frameworks that can be used for guidance in the selection of an enterprise architecture framework. Through the research we have found factors that have made a significant effect on the quality of chosen enterprise architecture frameworks. Multi-criteria model for qualitative assessment of appropriateness of the enterprise architecture frameworks has been developed applying DEX method and decision-making program DEXi. Development of the model was carried out successively and finally applied to the analysed the top three enterprise architecture frameworks. To validate the value of our research we prepare practical presentation of the chosen enterprise architecture frameworks. Enterprise architecture frameworks were given five different hierarchical descriptive marks. The worst mark was given to Zachman framework, a little better mark very got TOGAF and ArchiMate. Combination of TOGAF and ArchiMate was assessed with the best mark excellent. But these ranks are not important. More important are differences between frameworks. This study should provide a good starting point for understanding the value of each of these frameworks. Niche problems may require niche solutions. When selecting an enterprise architecture framework, organizations should consider a range of criteria, and should weight these according to their current and future needs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Today's enterprises are facing a competitive power in the dynamically changing business environment. With increasing complexity of enterprise, enterprise architecture have become an important field. Creating an enterprise architecture can be complex task, so enterprise architecture framework were created to simplify the process and guide an architect through all areas of architecture development. This study concentrates on the comparative analysis of enterprise architecture frameworks. There are numbers of already established enterprise architecture frameworks in use today. Enterprise architecture frameworks are necessary to capture the entire complexity of enterprise. Some of these frameworks were developed for specific areas, whereas others have broader functionality. None of the enterprise architecture frameworks is really complete. Each has its strengths and weaknesses. In this research, we provide a comparison of several classic frameworks that can be used for guidance in the selection of an enterprise architecture framework. Through the research we have found factors that have made a significant effect on the quality of chosen enterprise architecture frameworks. Multi-criteria model for qualitative assessment of appropriateness of the enterprise architecture frameworks has been developed applying DEX method and decision-making program DEXi. Development of the model was carried out successively and finally applied to the analysed the top three enterprise architecture frameworks. To validate the value of our research we prepare practical presentation of the chosen enterprise architecture frameworks. Enterprise architecture frameworks were given five different hierarchical descriptive marks. The worst mark was given to Zachman framework, a little better mark very got TOGAF and ArchiMate. Combination of TOGAF and ArchiMate was assessed with the best mark excellent. But these ranks are not important. More important are differences between frameworks. This study should provide a good starting point for understanding the value of each of these frameworks. Niche problems may require niche solutions. When selecting an enterprise architecture framework, organizations should consider a range of criteria, and should weight these according to their current and future needs.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Today's enterprises are facing a competitive power in the dynamically changing business environment. With increasing complexity of enterprise, enterprise architecture have become an important field. Creating an enterprise architecture can be complex task, so enterprise architecture framework were created to simplify the process and guide an architect through all areas of architecture development. This study concentrates on the comparative analysis of enterprise architecture frameworks. There are numbers of already established enterprise architecture frameworks in use today. Enterprise architecture frameworks are necessary to capture the entire complexity of enterprise. Some of these frameworks were developed for specific areas, whereas others have broader functionality. None of the enterprise architecture frameworks is really complete. Each has its strengths and weaknesses. In this research, we provide a comparison of several classic frameworks that can be used for guidance in the selection of an enterprise architecture framework. Through the research we have found factors that have made a significant effect on the quality of chosen enterprise architecture frameworks. Multi-criteria model for qualitative assessment of appropriateness of the enterprise architecture frameworks has been developed applying DEX method and decision-making program DEXi. Development of the model was carried out successively and finally applied to the analysed the top three enterprise architecture frameworks. To validate the value of our research we prepare practical presentation of the chosen enterprise architecture frameworks. Enterprise architecture frameworks were given five different hierarchical descriptive marks. The worst mark was given to Zachman framework, a little better mark very got TOGAF and ArchiMate. Combination of TOGAF and ArchiMate was assessed with the best mark excellent. But these ranks are not important. More important are differences between frameworks. This study should provide a good starting point for understanding the value of each of these frameworks. Niche problems may require niche solutions. When selecting an enterprise architecture framework, organizations should consider a range of criteria, and should weight these according to their current and future needs.

Key concepts: The Open Group Architecture Framework, Enterprise architecture, Enterprise architecture framework, Enterprise architecture management, Business architecture, View model, NIST Enterprise Architecture Model, Solution architecture

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative analysis of enterprise architecture frameworks — Research Paper | ScholarLens