1982Built EnvironmentRequires access

Financing Public Transport: The Regional Aspects

David Miller

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Although a high level of investment has benefited the UK highways in the past, it has been at the expense of transport, both bus and rail. Increasing car ownership has also resulted in reduced income for British Rail and Passenger Transport Executives. The issue discussed is whether transport should function as a public or operate on commercial criteria. Continuing to operate transport as a service would entail an increasing subsidy from funds. More commercially-based systems would mean that services would be dependent on income generated and financial limits set, on subsidies given by central government. The effect of applying stricter financial criteria would be the withdrawal of many services and reduced accessibility in certain areas. The economic prospects of parts of the country may therefore be affected if the form of transport judged to be sustainable is decided on financial criteria rather than the needs of urban and rural areas.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Although a high level of investment has benefited the UK highways in the past, it has been at the expense of transport, both bus and rail. Increasing car ownership has also resulted in reduced income for British Rail and Passenger Transport Executives. The issue discussed is whether transport should function as a public or operate on commercial criteria. Continuing to operate transport as a service would entail an increasing subsidy from funds. More commercially-based systems would mean that services would be dependent on income generated and financial limits set, on subsidies given by central government. The effect of applying stricter financial criteria would be the withdrawal of many services and reduced accessibility in certain areas. The economic prospects of parts of the country may therefore be affected if the form of transport judged to be sustainable is decided on financial criteria rather than the needs of urban and rural areas.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Although a high level of investment has benefited the UK highways in the past, it has been at the expense of transport, both bus and rail. Increasing car ownership has also resulted in reduced income for British Rail and Passenger Transport Executives. The issue discussed is whether transport should function as a public or operate on commercial criteria. Continuing to operate transport as a service would entail an increasing subsidy from funds. More commercially-based systems would mean that services would be dependent on income generated and financial limits set, on subsidies given by central government. The effect of applying stricter financial criteria would be the withdrawal of many services and reduced accessibility in certain areas. The economic prospects of parts of the country may therefore be affected if the form of transport judged to be sustainable is decided on financial criteria rather than the needs of urban and rural areas.

Key concepts: Subsidy, Public transport, Business, Finance, Service (business), Investment (military), Government (linguistics), Car ownership

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Financing Public Transport: The Regional Aspects — Research Paper | ScholarLens