2007•Railway gazette internationalRequires access

PTC Starts to Roll Out Across the USA

Joe Drapa, Bill Moore, Ede Polivka, Alan L. Polivka

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

This article relates how Positive Train Control (PTC) has gained significant momentum in the U.S. Four Class I railroads (BNSF, CSX, Norfolk Southern, and Union Pacific), as well as Amtrak, are pursuing PTC systems. The advantages in using PTC include improved safety, lower operational costs, improved service, and increased network capacity. The various systems perform functions such as enforcing authority limits and speed restrictions, monitoring point position, interfacing with rail detection systems, and providing train location tracking. PTC systems also deliver safety critical information to the locomotive cab, and this information, when merged with the train’s GPS-provided location, enables automatic braking to be initiated if necessary. The use of GPS in determining a train’s location also eliminates the need for track transponders. The article details and compares the capabilities of the different PTC systems being used. They include Union Pacific’s Communications Based Train Control (CBTC), CSX’s Communications Based Train Management (CBTM); BNSF’s Electronic Train Management System (ETMS), Amtrak’s Incremental Train Control System (ITCS) and Norfolk Southern’s Optimized Train Control (OTC).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article relates how Positive Train Control (PTC) has gained significant momentum in the U.S. Four Class I railroads (BNSF, CSX, Norfolk Southern, and Union Pacific), as well as Amtrak, are pursuing PTC systems. The advantages in using PTC include improved safety, lower operational costs, improved service, and increased network capacity. The various systems perform functions such as enforcing authority limits and speed restrictions, monitoring point position, interfacing with rail detection systems, and providing train location tracking. PTC systems also deliver safety critical information to the locomotive cab, and this information, when merged with the train’s GPS-provided location, enables automatic braking to be initiated if necessary. The use of GPS in determining a train’s location also eliminates the need for track transponders. The article details and compares the capabilities of the different PTC systems being used. They include Union Pacific’s Communications Based Train Control (CBTC), CSX’s Communications Based Train Management (CBTM); BNSF’s Electronic Train Management System (ETMS), Amtrak’s Incremental Train Control System (ITCS) and Norfolk Southern’s Optimized Train Control (OTC).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article relates how Positive Train Control (PTC) has gained significant momentum in the U.S. Four Class I railroads (BNSF, CSX, Norfolk Southern, and Union Pacific), as well as Amtrak, are pursuing PTC systems. The advantages in using PTC include improved safety, lower operational costs, improved service, and increased network capacity. The various systems perform functions such as enforcing authority limits and speed restrictions, monitoring point position, interfacing with rail detection systems, and providing train location tracking. PTC systems also deliver safety critical information to the locomotive cab, and this information, when merged with the train’s GPS-provided location, enables automatic braking to be initiated if necessary. The use of GPS in determining a train’s location also eliminates the need for track transponders. The article details and compares the capabilities of the different PTC systems being used. They include Union Pacific’s Communications Based Train Control (CBTC), CSX’s Communications Based Train Management (CBTM); BNSF’s Electronic Train Management System (ETMS), Amtrak’s Incremental Train Control System (ITCS) and Norfolk Southern’s Optimized Train Control (OTC).

Key concepts: Global Positioning System, Track (disk drive), Automatic train control, Interfacing, Control (management), Automotive engineering, Telecommunications, Automatic vehicle location

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
PTC Starts to Roll Out Across the USA — Research Paper | ScholarLens