1995Unpublished venueRequires access

New Directions for Scientific Discovery Research

Peter D. Karp

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Much past AI research in scientific reasoning has fallen within the paradigm of historical study: we research some historical instance of scientific reasoning, and create a computer program (and associated theory) that automates that reasoning. This historical paradigm of studying scientific reasoning is of little or no further use to AI; the field must focus on building programs that make truly novel scientific discoveries. The first reason is that the historical para~iigm is not convincing to those who doubt that computers can in fact make scientific discoveries. It is high time to prove that computers are capable of making novel scientific discoveries by exhibiting many examples of such discoveries. The second reason is that scientific-discovery researchers are in danger of being beaten to the gold by computational scientists: while we leisurely work on historical problems, they are already racing forward to make real discoveries.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Much past AI research in scientific reasoning has fallen within the paradigm of historical study: we research some historical instance of scientific reasoning, and create a computer program (and associated theory) that automates that reasoning. This historical paradigm of studying scientific reasoning is of little or no further use to AI; the field must focus on building programs that make truly novel scientific discoveries. The first reason is that the historical para~iigm is not convincing to those who doubt that computers can in fact make scientific discoveries. It is high time to prove that computers are capable of making novel scientific discoveries by exhibiting many examples of such discoveries. The second reason is that scientific-discovery researchers are in danger of being beaten to the gold by computational scientists: while we leisurely work on historical problems, they are already racing forward to make real discoveries.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Much past AI research in scientific reasoning has fallen within the paradigm of historical study: we research some historical instance of scientific reasoning, and create a computer program (and associated theory) that automates that reasoning. This historical paradigm of studying scientific reasoning is of little or no further use to AI; the field must focus on building programs that make truly novel scientific discoveries. The first reason is that the historical para~iigm is not convincing to those who doubt that computers can in fact make scientific discoveries. It is high time to prove that computers are capable of making novel scientific discoveries by exhibiting many examples of such discoveries. The second reason is that scientific-discovery researchers are in danger of being beaten to the gold by computational scientists: while we leisurely work on historical problems, they are already racing forward to make real discoveries.

Key concepts: Scientific discovery, Computer science, Scientific reasoning, Scientific field, Data science, Field (mathematics), Focus (optics), Engineering ethics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
New Directions for Scientific Discovery Research — Research Paper | ScholarLens