2003The US Army War College Quarterly ParametersOpen access

An Alternative Future Force: Building a Better Army

Peter A. Wilson, John Gordon, David E. Johnson

Open full text 18 citations

Abstract

R ecent operations in Iraq highlight the need for the Army's leadership to rethink major aspects of its transformation strategy.While the threeweek period of combat operations that toppled the regime illuminates one set of implications, the continued and contested postwar operations illuminate another.Furthermore, the insights emerging from Iraq are not isolated, but part of a growing body of operational knowledge gleaned from post-Cold War operations in Bosnia, Rwanda, Somalia, Haiti, Kosovo, and Afghanistan.In the light of this decade of hard-won experience, it seems that the Army's transformation concept rests on a set of major assumptions which should be questioned.This article examines some of those assumptions and suggests an alternative pathway for preparing US ground forces to meet the challenges of the next several decades. 20Parameters

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

R ecent operations in Iraq highlight the need for the Army's leadership to rethink major aspects of its transformation strategy.While the threeweek period of combat operations that toppled the regime illuminates one set of implications, the continued and contested postwar operations illuminate another.Furthermore, the insights emerging from Iraq are not isolated, but part of a growing body of operational knowledge gleaned from post-Cold War operations in Bosnia, Rwanda, Somalia, Haiti, Kosovo, and Afghanistan.In the light of this decade of hard-won experience, it seems that the Army's transformation concept rests on a set of major assumptions which should be questioned.This article examines some of those assumptions and suggests an alternative pathway for preparing US ground forces to meet the challenges of the next several decades. 20Parameters

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

R ecent operations in Iraq highlight the need for the Army's leadership to rethink major aspects of its transformation strategy.While the threeweek period of combat operations that toppled the regime illuminates one set of implications, the continued and contested postwar operations illuminate another.Furthermore, the insights emerging from Iraq are not isolated, but part of a growing body of operational knowledge gleaned from post-Cold War operations in Bosnia, Rwanda, Somalia, Haiti, Kosovo, and Afghanistan.In the light of this decade of hard-won experience, it seems that the Army's transformation concept rests on a set of major assumptions which should be questioned.This article examines some of those assumptions and suggests an alternative pathway for preparing US ground forces to meet the challenges of the next several decades. 20Parameters

Key concepts: Political science, Use of force, Law, International law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An Alternative Future Force: Building a Better Army — Research Paper | ScholarLens