2016Unpublished venueRequires access

To Drill or Not to Drill: Implied Covenants in Oil and Gas Leases

Clement L. Glynn, Brian L. Cella

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Will Rogers' Depression-era remark is painfully apt to the energy business of today. The low prices of recent years have inspired countless complaints that things can't go on like this. Lower energy prices tend to reduce leasehold activity, thereby reducing production and royalties. During such hard times, the potential for conflict between oil and gas lessors and lessees increases. The parties may review their lease for express performance obligations and find few. The role of implied covenants then becomes the focus of the analysis. Although the rules applicable to implied covenants vary by jurisdiction and with the facts of each case, there are common themes. In general, implied covenants sound in good faith and reasonableness. They are therefore adaptable to changing economic conditions. What is reasonable in one price environment may be unreasonable in another. Such flexibility is only fair because the lessor's remedies for breach of im-

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Will Rogers' Depression-era remark is painfully apt to the energy business of today. The low prices of recent years have inspired countless complaints that things can't go on like this. Lower energy prices tend to reduce leasehold activity, thereby reducing production and royalties. During such hard times, the potential for conflict between oil and gas lessors and lessees increases. The parties may review their lease for express performance obligations and find few. The role of implied covenants then becomes the focus of the analysis. Although the rules applicable to implied covenants vary by jurisdiction and with the facts of each case, there are common themes. In general, implied covenants sound in good faith and reasonableness. They are therefore adaptable to changing economic conditions. What is reasonable in one price environment may be unreasonable in another. Such flexibility is only fair because the lessor's remedies for breach of im-

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Will Rogers' Depression-era remark is painfully apt to the energy business of today. The low prices of recent years have inspired countless complaints that things can't go on like this. Lower energy prices tend to reduce leasehold activity, thereby reducing production and royalties. During such hard times, the potential for conflict between oil and gas lessors and lessees increases. The parties may review their lease for express performance obligations and find few. The role of implied covenants then becomes the focus of the analysis. Although the rules applicable to implied covenants vary by jurisdiction and with the facts of each case, there are common themes. In general, implied covenants sound in good faith and reasonableness. They are therefore adaptable to changing economic conditions. What is reasonable in one price environment may be unreasonable in another. Such flexibility is only fair because the lessor's remedies for breach of im-

Key concepts: Lease, Covenant, Leasehold estate, Flexibility (engineering), Good faith, Law and economics, Jurisdiction, Fossil fuel

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
To Drill or Not to Drill: Implied Covenants in Oil and Gas Leases — Research Paper | ScholarLens