1976PubMedRequires access

Urbanization and economic development in the Philippines: some implications for regional policy.

E M Pernia

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The paper analyzes urbanization in the context of population growth, migration, and economic development. It suggests that the process of national urbanization decelerated in the post-war period due to the acceleration of population growth in the rural sector, stagnant agricultural productivity, and capital-intensive industialization. The common concern about rapid urbanization due to massive rural-to-urban migration would seem to be better directed to the unremitting movement of population to the metropolitan region and the consequent widening disparities between this region and all the other regions. The major determinants of rural-urban population shifts appear to be socioeconomic development factors in both rural and urban sectors rather than demographic pressure in rural areas, suggesting that rural development may not be considered as an antidote to urbanization. Rather, it implies that rural development along with a purposive and well-designed industrial location strategy can make important contributions to a policy of more balanced urbanization. Although rural demographic pressure may not have been effective as yet in unleashing population, it may well be so in the near future as land frontiers disappear and rural density limits are reached. A serious regional development policy is, therefore, needed so that potential massive population flows can be re-routed to areas other than the metropolitan region.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The paper analyzes urbanization in the context of population growth, migration, and economic development. It suggests that the process of national urbanization decelerated in the post-war period due to the acceleration of population growth in the rural sector, stagnant agricultural productivity, and capital-intensive industialization. The common concern about rapid urbanization due to massive rural-to-urban migration would seem to be better directed to the unremitting movement of population to the metropolitan region and the consequent widening disparities between this region and all the other regions. The major determinants of rural-urban population shifts appear to be socioeconomic development factors in both rural and urban sectors rather than demographic pressure in rural areas, suggesting that rural development may not be considered as an antidote to urbanization. Rather, it implies that rural development along with a purposive and well-designed industrial location strategy can make important contributions to a policy of more balanced urbanization. Although rural demographic pressure may not have been effective as yet in unleashing population, it may well be so in the near future as land frontiers disappear and rural density limits are reached. A serious regional development policy is, therefore, needed so that potential massive population flows can be re-routed to areas other than the metropolitan region.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The paper analyzes urbanization in the context of population growth, migration, and economic development. It suggests that the process of national urbanization decelerated in the post-war period due to the acceleration of population growth in the rural sector, stagnant agricultural productivity, and capital-intensive industialization. The common concern about rapid urbanization due to massive rural-to-urban migration would seem to be better directed to the unremitting movement of population to the metropolitan region and the consequent widening disparities between this region and all the other regions. The major determinants of rural-urban population shifts appear to be socioeconomic development factors in both rural and urban sectors rather than demographic pressure in rural areas, suggesting that rural development may not be considered as an antidote to urbanization. Rather, it implies that rural development along with a purposive and well-designed industrial location strategy can make important contributions to a policy of more balanced urbanization. Although rural demographic pressure may not have been effective as yet in unleashing population, it may well be so in the near future as land frontiers disappear and rural density limits are reached. A serious regional development policy is, therefore, needed so that potential massive population flows can be re-routed to areas other than the metropolitan region.

Key concepts: Urbanization, Metropolitan area, Population, Economic growth, Development economics, Geography, Rural area, Context (archaeology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Urbanization and economic development in the Philippines: some implications for regional policy. — Research Paper | ScholarLens