2013Southern law journalRequires access

The Debate over Replacing the Present Income Tax with an Alternative Tax Structure

Edward B. Hymson

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

I. IntroductionThere is an ongoing debate about whether United States should switch from its present progressive income tax structure to a consumption tax or a hybrid income tax, and whether tax structure chosen should be a flat tax (all taxpayers pay same percentage) or a progressive tax. The debate turns on disputes over economic efficiency of alternative structures, social welfare, and transition problems inherent in any attempt to change present tax structure. The following discussion identifies mainstream proposals to replace or modify present income tax structure as well as identifying theoretical and practical reasons for and against proposing changes.Whether a pure income tax, a pure consumption tax, or a hybrid tax structure is preferable depends largely on whether it is desirable to always, sometimes, or never tax return to earnings from savings and investments (income invested in savings accounts, stocks and bonds, real property, or a business).1 Consumption tax supporters argue that their preferred structure maintains parity of present value between consumption and savings decisions, prevents over consumption and under-saving, and moves toward a more efficient tax structure.2 Hybrid income tax supporters argue that their structure can achieve most of benefits of converting to a consumption tax without having to deal with major problems associated with managing transition.3Both income tax and consumption tax structures can be designed to be either flat (a constant tax rate regardless of level of income or consumption), or progressive (a tax rate that increases as income or consumption increases). Whether a flat tax rate or a progressive tax rate is preferable depends on both effect of progressive taxes on work and investment incentives and on differing definitions of social welfare posited by advocates of two alternatives.II. Definition of Income, Consumption, and Hybrid TaxesA. Income and ConsumptionThe Haig-Simons definition of income is the algebraic sum of (1) market value of rights exercised in consumption and (2) change in value of store of property rights between beginning and end of period in question.4 Consumption is using up of goods and services5 and a consumption tax is imposed on portion of income that is consumed either immediately (for example by eating food or going to a movie) or over time (for example by purchasing a consumer durable good that wears out over time such as a personal residence, washing machine, or automobile).6B. Income Tax, Consumption Tax, and Hybrid TaxAn income tax is a tax imposed during year as either a flat percentage of income or as a percentage that progressively increases as annual income increases, less whatever exemptions from taxable income (tax expenditures) are mandated by statute. A pure income tax taxes all income earned from any source.A consumption tax is a tax on market value of all goods and services consumed during year imposed as either a flat percentage of consumption or as a percentage that progressively increases as annual consumption increases, less whatever tax expenditures are mandated by statute.7 It is imposed on consumption financed from income, funds removed from saving/investment (as either income or principal), as well as funds that are borrowed. A consumption tax does not tax income used to repay prior borrowings. It can be imposed on either increase in value of goods and services at each stage of production, a value added tax (VAT), as a tax on value of final sale of goods and services, a retail sales tax, or as a flat or progressive tax on each individual's annual aggregate consumption. VAT and retail sales tax are usually a flat tax ultimately paid by consumer on all goods and services consumed.8A hybrid income tax has some characteristics of an income tax and some of a consumption tax. …

About this research paper

What this paper is about

I. IntroductionThere is an ongoing debate about whether United States should switch from its present progressive income tax structure to a consumption tax or a hybrid income tax, and whether tax structure chosen should be a flat tax (all taxpayers pay same percentage) or a progressive tax. The debate turns on disputes over economic efficiency of alternative structures, social welfare, and transition problems inherent in any attempt to change present tax structure. The following discussion identifies mainstream proposals to replace or modify present income tax structure as well as identifying theoretical and practical reasons for and against proposing changes.Whether a pure income tax, a pure consumption tax, or a hybrid tax structure is preferable depends largely on whether it is desirable to always, sometimes, or never tax return to earnings from savings and investments (income invested in savings accounts, stocks and bonds, real property, or a business).1 Consumption tax supporters argue that their preferred structure maintains parity of present value between consumption and savings decisions, prevents over consumption and under-saving, and moves toward a more efficient tax structure.2 Hybrid income tax supporters argue that their structure can achieve most of benefits of converting to a consumption tax without having to deal with major problems associated with managing transition.3Both income tax and consumption tax structures can be designed to be either flat (a constant tax rate regardless of level of income or consumption), or progressive (a tax rate that increases as income or consumption increases). Whether a flat tax rate or a progressive tax rate is preferable depends on both effect of progressive taxes on work and investment incentives and on differing definitions of social welfare posited by advocates of two alternatives.II. Definition of Income, Consumption, and Hybrid TaxesA. Income and ConsumptionThe Haig-Simons definition of income is the algebraic sum of (1) market value of rights exercised in consumption and (2) change in value of store of property rights between beginning and end of period in question.4 Consumption is using up of goods and services5 and a consumption tax is imposed on portion of income that is consumed either immediately (for example by eating food or going to a movie) or over time (for example by purchasing a consumer durable good that wears out over time such as a personal residence, washing machine, or automobile).6B. Income Tax, Consumption Tax, and Hybrid TaxAn income tax is a tax imposed during year as either a flat percentage of income or as a percentage that progressively increases as annual income increases, less whatever exemptions from taxable income (tax expenditures) are mandated by statute. A pure income tax taxes all income earned from any source.A consumption tax is a tax on market value of all goods and services consumed during year imposed as either a flat percentage of consumption or as a percentage that progressively increases as annual consumption increases, less whatever tax expenditures are mandated by statute.7 It is imposed on consumption financed from income, funds removed from saving/investment (as either income or principal), as well as funds that are borrowed. A consumption tax does not tax income used to repay prior borrowings. It can be imposed on either increase in value of goods and services at each stage of production, a value added tax (VAT), as a tax on value of final sale of goods and services, a retail sales tax, or as a flat or progressive tax on each individual's annual aggregate consumption. VAT and retail sales tax are usually a flat tax ultimately paid by consumer on all goods and services consumed.8A hybrid income tax has some characteristics of an income tax and some of a consumption tax. …

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

I. IntroductionThere is an ongoing debate about whether United States should switch from its present progressive income tax structure to a consumption tax or a hybrid income tax, and whether tax structure chosen should be a flat tax (all taxpayers pay same percentage) or a progressive tax. The debate turns on disputes over economic efficiency of alternative structures, social welfare, and transition problems inherent in any attempt to change present tax structure. The following discussion identifies mainstream proposals to replace or modify present income tax structure as well as identifying theoretical and practical reasons for and against proposing changes.Whether a pure income tax, a pure consumption tax, or a hybrid tax structure is preferable depends largely on whether it is desirable to always, sometimes, or never tax return to earnings from savings and investments (income invested in savings accounts, stocks and bonds, real property, or a business).1 Consumption tax supporters argue that their preferred structure maintains parity of present value between consumption and savings decisions, prevents over consumption and under-saving, and moves toward a more efficient tax structure.2 Hybrid income tax supporters argue that their structure can achieve most of benefits of converting to a consumption tax without having to deal with major problems associated with managing transition.3Both income tax and consumption tax structures can be designed to be either flat (a constant tax rate regardless of level of income or consumption), or progressive (a tax rate that increases as income or consumption increases). Whether a flat tax rate or a progressive tax rate is preferable depends on both effect of progressive taxes on work and investment incentives and on differing definitions of social welfare posited by advocates of two alternatives.II. Definition of Income, Consumption, and Hybrid TaxesA. Income and ConsumptionThe Haig-Simons definition of income is the algebraic sum of (1) market value of rights exercised in consumption and (2) change in value of store of property rights between beginning and end of period in question.4 Consumption is using up of goods and services5 and a consumption tax is imposed on portion of income that is consumed either immediately (for example by eating food or going to a movie) or over time (for example by purchasing a consumer durable good that wears out over time such as a personal residence, washing machine, or automobile).6B. Income Tax, Consumption Tax, and Hybrid TaxAn income tax is a tax imposed during year as either a flat percentage of income or as a percentage that progressively increases as annual income increases, less whatever exemptions from taxable income (tax expenditures) are mandated by statute. A pure income tax taxes all income earned from any source.A consumption tax is a tax on market value of all goods and services consumed during year imposed as either a flat percentage of consumption or as a percentage that progressively increases as annual consumption increases, less whatever tax expenditures are mandated by statute.7 It is imposed on consumption financed from income, funds removed from saving/investment (as either income or principal), as well as funds that are borrowed. A consumption tax does not tax income used to repay prior borrowings. It can be imposed on either increase in value of goods and services at each stage of production, a value added tax (VAT), as a tax on value of final sale of goods and services, a retail sales tax, or as a flat or progressive tax on each individual's annual aggregate consumption. VAT and retail sales tax are usually a flat tax ultimately paid by consumer on all goods and services consumed.8A hybrid income tax has some characteristics of an income tax and some of a consumption tax. …

Key concepts: Consumption tax, Economics, Indirect tax, State income tax, Value-added tax, Tax reform, Ad valorem tax, Tax credit

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Debate over Replacing the Present Income Tax with an Alternative Tax Structure — Research Paper | ScholarLens