1988Journal of The Korean Astronomical SocietyRequires access

Stellar Activity and Rotation Period of Lower Main Sequence Stars

Hong Sik Yun, Young Deuk Park

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

To examine relations between stellar activity and rotation we estimated parameters of stellar activity such as , , , and from the published data which measure the activity levels of stellar chromospheres, transition regions and coronae. In the present study we considered only the main sequence stars in an attempt to minimize the influence of other stellar parameters such as radius, age and stellar convection on stellar activity since they are also known to affect the magnetic field generation. In the present analysis we selected only those stars that satisfy the following conditions: (1) flux measurements are available together with Ca II fluxes and (2) rotation periods are determined by Ca II observations. We derived relations between the number and stellar activity , , , and and assessed the relations by plotting , and against rotation period for comparison with observations. From the comparison it is found that as far as the rotation-activity relation is concerned, (1) normalized surface flux is better than the surface flux , in the sense that differentiates the color dependence better and (2) defined by Rutten (1984) describes the observations notably better than of Noyes et al. (1984).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To examine relations between stellar activity and rotation we estimated parameters of stellar activity such as , , , and from the published data which measure the activity levels of stellar chromospheres, transition regions and coronae. In the present study we considered only the main sequence stars in an attempt to minimize the influence of other stellar parameters such as radius, age and stellar convection on stellar activity since they are also known to affect the magnetic field generation. In the present analysis we selected only those stars that satisfy the following conditions: (1) flux measurements are available together with Ca II fluxes and (2) rotation periods are determined by Ca II observations. We derived relations between the number and stellar activity , , , and and assessed the relations by plotting , and against rotation period for comparison with observations. From the comparison it is found that as far as the rotation-activity relation is concerned, (1) normalized surface flux is better than the surface flux , in the sense that differentiates the color dependence better and (2) defined by Rutten (1984) describes the observations notably better than of Noyes et al. (1984).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To examine relations between stellar activity and rotation we estimated parameters of stellar activity such as , , , and from the published data which measure the activity levels of stellar chromospheres, transition regions and coronae. In the present study we considered only the main sequence stars in an attempt to minimize the influence of other stellar parameters such as radius, age and stellar convection on stellar activity since they are also known to affect the magnetic field generation. In the present analysis we selected only those stars that satisfy the following conditions: (1) flux measurements are available together with Ca II fluxes and (2) rotation periods are determined by Ca II observations. We derived relations between the number and stellar activity , , , and and assessed the relations by plotting , and against rotation period for comparison with observations. From the comparison it is found that as far as the rotation-activity relation is concerned, (1) normalized surface flux is better than the surface flux , in the sense that differentiates the color dependence better and (2) defined by Rutten (1984) describes the observations notably better than of Noyes et al. (1984).

Key concepts: Physics, Stellar rotation, Astrophysics, Rotation period, Stars, Rotation (mathematics), Flux (metallurgy), Main sequence

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Stellar Activity and Rotation Period of Lower Main Sequence Stars — Research Paper | ScholarLens