1994Quality Management JournalRequires access

Organizing for Quality-Including a Study of Corporate-Level Quality Management in Large U.K.-Owned Companies

John Groocock

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The way a company organizes for quality defends both on the complexity of the company and whether its quality philosophy is one of quality assurance (QA) or quality improvement (QI). Fora small business with a QA philosophy, it is probably best to have a strong QA department that performs all inspection and test. If a small business has a QI philosophy, it is best for inspection and test to be performed by the manufacturing department. The quality department should be mainly responsible for obtaining, analyzing, and publishing quality data. There should also be a multifunctional QI board, chaired by a senior department head, but not the quality manager.Multidivisional companies with a QA philosophy are discussed only briefly because most corporate quality programs follow a QI philosophy. For the latter, a successful approach must have at least a 10-year time scale. Alternatives are to have a corporate QI board chaired by the chief executive or other senior executive as his or her delegate, or a company quality manager leading a small corporate quality department, or both. It is helpful to have staff quality positions in company subsidiaries and to use quality councils to ensure that the quality managers at all levels apply a consistent company quality philosophy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The way a company organizes for quality defends both on the complexity of the company and whether its quality philosophy is one of quality assurance (QA) or quality improvement (QI). Fora small business with a QA philosophy, it is probably best to have a strong QA department that performs all inspection and test. If a small business has a QI philosophy, it is best for inspection and test to be performed by the manufacturing department. The quality department should be mainly responsible for obtaining, analyzing, and publishing quality data. There should also be a multifunctional QI board, chaired by a senior department head, but not the quality manager.Multidivisional companies with a QA philosophy are discussed only briefly because most corporate quality programs follow a QI philosophy. For the latter, a successful approach must have at least a 10-year time scale. Alternatives are to have a corporate QI board chaired by the chief executive or other senior executive as his or her delegate, or a company quality manager leading a small corporate quality department, or both. It is helpful to have staff quality positions in company subsidiaries and to use quality councils to ensure that the quality managers at all levels apply a consistent company quality philosophy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The way a company organizes for quality defends both on the complexity of the company and whether its quality philosophy is one of quality assurance (QA) or quality improvement (QI). Fora small business with a QA philosophy, it is probably best to have a strong QA department that performs all inspection and test. If a small business has a QI philosophy, it is best for inspection and test to be performed by the manufacturing department. The quality department should be mainly responsible for obtaining, analyzing, and publishing quality data. There should also be a multifunctional QI board, chaired by a senior department head, but not the quality manager.Multidivisional companies with a QA philosophy are discussed only briefly because most corporate quality programs follow a QI philosophy. For the latter, a successful approach must have at least a 10-year time scale. Alternatives are to have a corporate QI board chaired by the chief executive or other senior executive as his or her delegate, or a company quality manager leading a small corporate quality department, or both. It is helpful to have staff quality positions in company subsidiaries and to use quality councils to ensure that the quality managers at all levels apply a consistent company quality philosophy.

Key concepts: Quality (philosophy), Subsidiary, Quality assurance, Quality management, Delegate, Total quality management, Business, Test (biology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Organizing for Quality-Including a Study of Corporate-Level Quality Management in Large U.K.-Owned Companies — Research Paper | ScholarLens