2015Journal of Game TheoryRequires access

On the Evolution of Cooperative Behavior in Prisoner's Dilemma

Essam El Seidy, Ali M. Almuntaser

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Cooperation is always vulnerable to exploitation by defectors in the prisoner's dilemma game unless a mechanism for the evolution of cooperation is at work. Hence, the evolution of cooperation requires specific mechanisms, which allow natural selection to favor cooperation over defection. There are some mechanisms like kin selection, group selection, direct and indirect reciprocity can evolve the cooperation when it works alone. Here we combine two and three mechanisms together in one population. The transformed matrices for each combination are determined. We show that, when two or three mechanisms works together, a strong cooperation can evolve between players more than when each mechanism works alone. Some properties of cooperation like risk-dominant (RD) and advantageous (AD) are studied. The property of evolutionary stable (ESS) for strategies which used in this paper is discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Cooperation is always vulnerable to exploitation by defectors in the prisoner's dilemma game unless a mechanism for the evolution of cooperation is at work. Hence, the evolution of cooperation requires specific mechanisms, which allow natural selection to favor cooperation over defection. There are some mechanisms like kin selection, group selection, direct and indirect reciprocity can evolve the cooperation when it works alone. Here we combine two and three mechanisms together in one population. The transformed matrices for each combination are determined. We show that, when two or three mechanisms works together, a strong cooperation can evolve between players more than when each mechanism works alone. Some properties of cooperation like risk-dominant (RD) and advantageous (AD) are studied. The property of evolutionary stable (ESS) for strategies which used in this paper is discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Cooperation is always vulnerable to exploitation by defectors in the prisoner's dilemma game unless a mechanism for the evolution of cooperation is at work. Hence, the evolution of cooperation requires specific mechanisms, which allow natural selection to favor cooperation over defection. There are some mechanisms like kin selection, group selection, direct and indirect reciprocity can evolve the cooperation when it works alone. Here we combine two and three mechanisms together in one population. The transformed matrices for each combination are determined. We show that, when two or three mechanisms works together, a strong cooperation can evolve between players more than when each mechanism works alone. Some properties of cooperation like risk-dominant (RD) and advantageous (AD) are studied. The property of evolutionary stable (ESS) for strategies which used in this paper is discussed.

Key concepts: Prisoner's dilemma, Superrationality, Dilemma, Reciprocity (cultural anthropology), Kin selection, Mechanism (biology), Strong reciprocity, Selection (genetic algorithm)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the Evolution of Cooperative Behavior in Prisoner's Dilemma — Research Paper | ScholarLens