1981•Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)Requires access

Evaluation of Wastewater Filtration

Bryant L. Benth, E. Joe Middlebrooks, Dennis B. George, James H. Reynolds

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Tertiary filtration of secondary wastewater is frequently used to improve wastewater treatment plant effluent quality. Four experimental filter columns were operated at the Preston, Idaho, Wastewater Treatment Plant to evaluate the effectiveness of granular media, gravity filtration. The Preston plant is a trickling filter secondary treatment plant and services a population of approximately 3600 people. Four filter medium configurations were studied. Multi-media, dual-media, and single-media beds were constructed with the following media configurations: (1) coal-sand-garnet; (2) coal-sand; (3) sand-garnet; and (4) all sand. The filters were operated at two hydraulic loading rates. Effluents from the primary clarifier, trickling filter, and secondary clarifier were filtered to compare the difference in filter operation and performance when filtering different effluents. Wastewater quality parameters used to monitor filter performance were biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) and suspended solids. The quality of filter influend affected the quality of the filter effluent. Typical total BOD5 and suspended soilds removal efficiencies were 30 percent and 75 percent, respectively. Soluble BOD5 was not significantly removed by granular filtration. The four filter beds were equally effective in removing suspended solids and biochemical oxygen demand. The coal layered filters operated for 22 hours maximum. The longest filter run time for the sand filters was 9 hours. Filtration of the Preston treatment facility effluent did not consistently produce and effluent that would satisfy the 10 mg/l BOD5 effluent discharge requirement. A survey conducted to review approbal criteria and design standards for wastewater filters employed by state regulatory agencies indicated the following. Most state standards allowed the installation of either gravity flow filters or pressure filters. The majority of state agencies base the allowable hydraulic loading rate on the type and configuration of media employed. The majority of the design standards for wastewater filters permitted the following media types: (1) sand; (2) anthracite; (3) sand and anthracite; (4) sand, anthracite, and garnet or ilmenite. All wastewater filter design standards called for backwast appurtenances complete with air scour or mechanical scour.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Tertiary filtration of secondary wastewater is frequently used to improve wastewater treatment plant effluent quality. Four experimental filter columns were operated at the Preston, Idaho, Wastewater Treatment Plant to evaluate the effectiveness of granular media, gravity filtration. The Preston plant is a trickling filter secondary treatment plant and services a population of approximately 3600 people. Four filter medium configurations were studied. Multi-media, dual-media, and single-media beds were constructed with the following media configurations: (1) coal-sand-garnet; (2) coal-sand; (3) sand-garnet; and (4) all sand. The filters were operated at two hydraulic loading rates. Effluents from the primary clarifier, trickling filter, and secondary clarifier were filtered to compare the difference in filter operation and performance when filtering different effluents. Wastewater quality parameters used to monitor filter performance were biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) and suspended solids. The quality of filter influend affected the quality of the filter effluent. Typical total BOD5 and suspended soilds removal efficiencies were 30 percent and 75 percent, respectively. Soluble BOD5 was not significantly removed by granular filtration. The four filter beds were equally effective in removing suspended solids and biochemical oxygen demand. The coal layered filters operated for 22 hours maximum. The longest filter run time for the sand filters was 9 hours. Filtration of the Preston treatment facility effluent did not consistently produce and effluent that would satisfy the 10 mg/l BOD5 effluent discharge requirement. A survey conducted to review approbal criteria and design standards for wastewater filters employed by state regulatory agencies indicated the following. Most state standards allowed the installation of either gravity flow filters or pressure filters. The majority of state agencies base the allowable hydraulic loading rate on the type and configuration of media employed. The majority of the design standards for wastewater filters permitted the following media types: (1) sand; (2) anthracite; (3) sand and anthracite; (4) sand, anthracite, and garnet or ilmenite. All wastewater filter design standards called for backwast appurtenances complete with air scour or mechanical scour.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Tertiary filtration of secondary wastewater is frequently used to improve wastewater treatment plant effluent quality. Four experimental filter columns were operated at the Preston, Idaho, Wastewater Treatment Plant to evaluate the effectiveness of granular media, gravity filtration. The Preston plant is a trickling filter secondary treatment plant and services a population of approximately 3600 people. Four filter medium configurations were studied. Multi-media, dual-media, and single-media beds were constructed with the following media configurations: (1) coal-sand-garnet; (2) coal-sand; (3) sand-garnet; and (4) all sand. The filters were operated at two hydraulic loading rates. Effluents from the primary clarifier, trickling filter, and secondary clarifier were filtered to compare the difference in filter operation and performance when filtering different effluents. Wastewater quality parameters used to monitor filter performance were biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) and suspended solids. The quality of filter influend affected the quality of the filter effluent. Typical total BOD5 and suspended soilds removal efficiencies were 30 percent and 75 percent, respectively. Soluble BOD5 was not significantly removed by granular filtration. The four filter beds were equally effective in removing suspended solids and biochemical oxygen demand. The coal layered filters operated for 22 hours maximum. The longest filter run time for the sand filters was 9 hours. Filtration of the Preston treatment facility effluent did not consistently produce and effluent that would satisfy the 10 mg/l BOD5 effluent discharge requirement. A survey conducted to review approbal criteria and design standards for wastewater filters employed by state regulatory agencies indicated the following. Most state standards allowed the installation of either gravity flow filters or pressure filters. The majority of state agencies base the allowable hydraulic loading rate on the type and configuration of media employed. The majority of the design standards for wastewater filters permitted the following media types: (1) sand; (2) anthracite; (3) sand and anthracite; (4) sand, anthracite, and garnet or ilmenite. All wastewater filter design standards called for backwast appurtenances complete with air scour or mechanical scour.

Key concepts: Effluent, Trickling filter, Clarifier, Filtration (mathematics), Suspended solids, Wastewater, Environmental engineering, Filter (signal processing)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Wastewater Filtration — Research Paper | ScholarLens