2010PubMedRequires access

[Indication of fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treated by "windows technique" laminoforaminotomy].

Yuan-ming Chen, Anmin Jin, Hui Zhang, Li-xin Zhu, Shaoxiong Min, Li Zhang

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the indications of fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treated by "windows technique". METHODS: From December 1999 to December 2005, 145 consecutive patients who were treated by primary decompression with "windows technique" laminoforaminotomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, a retrospective study, were divided into 3 groups (A and B and C) by preoperative lumbar conditions and surgical methods. In group A, 39 patients with spinal instability or degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis or scoliosis underwent decompression and fusion; in group B, 31 patients with spinal instability or degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis or scoliosis underwent decompression alone; In group C, 75 patients without spinal instability or degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis or scoliosis were treated by decompression without fusion. On hospital medical records to review, they were followed up by telephone and out-patient referral. Statistics the duration of hospitalization, operative time, estimated blood loss; Observed recrudescence and reoperation and complication; and using Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale and satisfaction rate for efficacy assessment, application SPSS 13.0 software. RESULTS: All 145 patients had at least a 3-year follow-up (ranging 37 to 108 months). In the group C, the duration of hospitalization less than in the group A or B (P < 0.05); In the group A, the operative time and estimated blood loss greater than in the group B or C (P < 0.05); The group B treated by decompression alone in the presence of instability or spondylolisthesis or scoliosis showed the worst results by the Oswestry Disability Index or Visual Analog Scale or ate of satisfaction (P < 0.05). The same good results can be obtained in the group A and C. There were not different about recrudescence or reoperation or complication in the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Fusion should be performed on patients with instability or degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis or scoliosis after primary decompression with "windows technique" laminoforaminotomy. The patient with simple lumbar spinal stenosis undergone primary surgery does not require fusion.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To explore the indications of fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treated by "windows technique". METHODS: From December 1999 to December 2005, 145 consecutive patients who were treated by primary decompression with "windows technique" laminoforaminotomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, a retrospective study, were divided into 3 groups (A and B and C) by preoperative lumbar conditions and surgical methods. In group A, 39 patients with spinal instability or degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis or scoliosis underwent decompression and fusion; in group B, 31 patients with spinal instability or degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis or scoliosis underwent decompression alone; In group C, 75 patients without spinal instability or degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis or scoliosis were treated by decompression without fusion. On hospital medical records to review, they were followed up by telephone and out-patient referral. Statistics the duration of hospitalization, operative time, estimated blood loss; Observed recrudescence and reoperation and complication; and using Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale and satisfaction rate for efficacy assessment, application SPSS 13.0 software. RESULTS: All 145 patients had at least a 3-year follow-up (ranging 37 to 108 months). In the group C, the duration of hospitalization less than in the group A or B (P < 0.05); In the group A, the operative time and estimated blood loss greater than in the group B or C (P < 0.05); The group B treated by decompression alone in the presence of instability or spondylolisthesis or scoliosis showed the worst results by the Oswestry Disability Index or Visual Analog Scale or ate of satisfaction (P < 0.05). The same good results can be obtained in the group A and C. There were not different about recrudescence or reoperation or complication in the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Fusion should be performed on patients with instability or degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis or scoliosis after primary decompression with "windows technique" laminoforaminotomy. The patient with simple lumbar spinal stenosis undergone primary surgery does not require fusion.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the indications of fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treated by "windows technique". METHODS: From December 1999 to December 2005, 145 consecutive patients who were treated by primary decompression with "windows technique" laminoforaminotomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, a retrospective study, were divided into 3 groups (A and B and C) by preoperative lumbar conditions and surgical methods. In group A, 39 patients with spinal instability or degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis or scoliosis underwent decompression and fusion; in group B, 31 patients with spinal instability or degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis or scoliosis underwent decompression alone; In group C, 75 patients without spinal instability or degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis or scoliosis were treated by decompression without fusion. On hospital medical records to review, they were followed up by telephone and out-patient referral. Statistics the duration of hospitalization, operative time, estimated blood loss; Observed recrudescence and reoperation and complication; and using Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale and satisfaction rate for efficacy assessment, application SPSS 13.0 software. RESULTS: All 145 patients had at least a 3-year follow-up (ranging 37 to 108 months). In the group C, the duration of hospitalization less than in the group A or B (P < 0.05); In the group A, the operative time and estimated blood loss greater than in the group B or C (P < 0.05); The group B treated by decompression alone in the presence of instability or spondylolisthesis or scoliosis showed the worst results by the Oswestry Disability Index or Visual Analog Scale or ate of satisfaction (P < 0.05). The same good results can be obtained in the group A and C. There were not different about recrudescence or reoperation or complication in the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Fusion should be performed on patients with instability or degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis or scoliosis after primary decompression with "windows technique" laminoforaminotomy. The patient with simple lumbar spinal stenosis undergone primary surgery does not require fusion.

Key concepts: Medicine, Oswestry Disability Index, Surgery, Decompression, Visual analogue scale, Lumbar, Lumbar spinal stenosis, Spinal fusion

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Indication of fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treated by "windows technique" laminoforaminotomy]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens