2005Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooksRequires access

Relative Contributions of the Cerebellar Cortex and Cerebellar Nucleus to Eyelid Conditioning

William L. Nores, Javier F. Medina, Philip M. Steele, Michael D. Mauk

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

We have presented data addressing the relative contributions of the cerebellar cortex and nuclei in the acquisition and expression of conditioned eyelid responses. Data from a series of studies support the notion that while plasticity occurs in both the cerebellar cortex and nucleus, the cerebellar cortex is essential for acquisition, extinction, and for the proper expression of conditioned eyelid responses. We have presented arguments that the experiments that support this position were designed in ways to preclude confounds that were present in other attempts to identify the role of the cerebellar cortex in eyelid conditioning. We have also presented evidence that suggests plasticity in both the cerebellar cortex and nucleus is required for the expression of a conditioned response, and that reversing this plasticity only in the cerebellar cortex may be sufficient to produce extinction of conditioned responses. Computer simulations based on the connectivity of the cerebellum and on the sites and rules for plasticity suggested by our studies are able to acquire properly timed conditioned responses, and to extinguish responses with CS-alone presentations. These simulations will provide many empirically testable predictions that should facilitate our understanding of the cerebellar mechanisms of eyelid conditioning.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We have presented data addressing the relative contributions of the cerebellar cortex and nuclei in the acquisition and expression of conditioned eyelid responses. Data from a series of studies support the notion that while plasticity occurs in both the cerebellar cortex and nucleus, the cerebellar cortex is essential for acquisition, extinction, and for the proper expression of conditioned eyelid responses. We have presented arguments that the experiments that support this position were designed in ways to preclude confounds that were present in other attempts to identify the role of the cerebellar cortex in eyelid conditioning. We have also presented evidence that suggests plasticity in both the cerebellar cortex and nucleus is required for the expression of a conditioned response, and that reversing this plasticity only in the cerebellar cortex may be sufficient to produce extinction of conditioned responses. Computer simulations based on the connectivity of the cerebellum and on the sites and rules for plasticity suggested by our studies are able to acquire properly timed conditioned responses, and to extinguish responses with CS-alone presentations. These simulations will provide many empirically testable predictions that should facilitate our understanding of the cerebellar mechanisms of eyelid conditioning.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We have presented data addressing the relative contributions of the cerebellar cortex and nuclei in the acquisition and expression of conditioned eyelid responses. Data from a series of studies support the notion that while plasticity occurs in both the cerebellar cortex and nucleus, the cerebellar cortex is essential for acquisition, extinction, and for the proper expression of conditioned eyelid responses. We have presented arguments that the experiments that support this position were designed in ways to preclude confounds that were present in other attempts to identify the role of the cerebellar cortex in eyelid conditioning. We have also presented evidence that suggests plasticity in both the cerebellar cortex and nucleus is required for the expression of a conditioned response, and that reversing this plasticity only in the cerebellar cortex may be sufficient to produce extinction of conditioned responses. Computer simulations based on the connectivity of the cerebellum and on the sites and rules for plasticity suggested by our studies are able to acquire properly timed conditioned responses, and to extinguish responses with CS-alone presentations. These simulations will provide many empirically testable predictions that should facilitate our understanding of the cerebellar mechanisms of eyelid conditioning.

Key concepts: Cerebellar cortex, Neuroscience, Cerebellum, Nucleus, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Relative Contributions of the Cerebellar Cortex and Cerebellar Nucleus to Eyelid Conditioning — Research Paper | ScholarLens