2009PubMedRequires access

Simultaneous transurethral resection of prostate and prostate needle biopsy in patients with acute urinary retention and elevated prostate specific antigen levels.

Yen-Ta Chen, Po‐Hui Chiang, Chun‐Chien Hsu

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety and accuracy of simultaneous transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy and transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), patients with acute urinary retention (AUR) who underwent simultaneous prostate biopsy and TURP were compared with those treated by TURP alone. METHODS: From July 2000 to Jun 2004, 21 patients older than 70 years with AUR were included in each group. Patients with elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels > 4 ng(/ml) underwent TURP and TRUS-guided biopsy simultaneously (group I), while those with normal PSA levels < 4 ng(/ml) received TURP alone (group II). The average ages of group I and group II patients were 72.4 and 72.5 years. RESULTS: In group I, 4 patients (19%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer; 2 had metastasis and received hormone therapy; and 1 had localized cancer and was treated with brachytherapy. An 82-year-old patient with localized cancer opted for watchful waiting. Compared to group II, patients in group I did notshow aggregated morbidity, such as prolonged hospital stay, hematuria, or fever. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous TURP and TRUS-guided biopsy in healthy AUR patients does not increase the risk of morbidity. Furthermore, with this approach patients can recover from the stress of AUR and have a definite diagnosis of their condition.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety and accuracy of simultaneous transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy and transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), patients with acute urinary retention (AUR) who underwent simultaneous prostate biopsy and TURP were compared with those treated by TURP alone. METHODS: From July 2000 to Jun 2004, 21 patients older than 70 years with AUR were included in each group. Patients with elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels > 4 ng(/ml) underwent TURP and TRUS-guided biopsy simultaneously (group I), while those with normal PSA levels < 4 ng(/ml) received TURP alone (group II). The average ages of group I and group II patients were 72.4 and 72.5 years. RESULTS: In group I, 4 patients (19%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer; 2 had metastasis and received hormone therapy; and 1 had localized cancer and was treated with brachytherapy. An 82-year-old patient with localized cancer opted for watchful waiting. Compared to group II, patients in group I did notshow aggregated morbidity, such as prolonged hospital stay, hematuria, or fever. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous TURP and TRUS-guided biopsy in healthy AUR patients does not increase the risk of morbidity. Furthermore, with this approach patients can recover from the stress of AUR and have a definite diagnosis of their condition.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety and accuracy of simultaneous transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy and transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), patients with acute urinary retention (AUR) who underwent simultaneous prostate biopsy and TURP were compared with those treated by TURP alone. METHODS: From July 2000 to Jun 2004, 21 patients older than 70 years with AUR were included in each group. Patients with elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels > 4 ng(/ml) underwent TURP and TRUS-guided biopsy simultaneously (group I), while those with normal PSA levels < 4 ng(/ml) received TURP alone (group II). The average ages of group I and group II patients were 72.4 and 72.5 years. RESULTS: In group I, 4 patients (19%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer; 2 had metastasis and received hormone therapy; and 1 had localized cancer and was treated with brachytherapy. An 82-year-old patient with localized cancer opted for watchful waiting. Compared to group II, patients in group I did notshow aggregated morbidity, such as prolonged hospital stay, hematuria, or fever. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous TURP and TRUS-guided biopsy in healthy AUR patients does not increase the risk of morbidity. Furthermore, with this approach patients can recover from the stress of AUR and have a definite diagnosis of their condition.

Key concepts: Medicine, Urinary retention, Prostate cancer, Urology, Transrectal ultrasonography, Prostate biopsy, Biopsy, Prostate-specific antigen

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Simultaneous transurethral resection of prostate and prostate needle biopsy in patients with acute urinary retention and elevated prostate specific antigen levels. — Research Paper | ScholarLens