1989PubMedRequires access

The significance of a negative Papanicolaou smear with hyperkeratosis or parakeratosis.

Stephen Andrews, K Miyazawa

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

The significance of a cytologic diagnosis of hyperkeratosis or parakeratosis on a Papanicolaou smear reported as negative is unknown. We conducted a review of 170 women without uterine descensus who presented to Tripler Army Medical Center cervical clinic with a negative Papanicolaou smear but with hyperkeratosis or parakeratosis noted on the slide. All patients underwent colposcopy, and 64% had either cervical punch biopsy or endocervical curettage. Six women (3.5%) had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia documented histopathologically. We conclude that the cellular findings of hyperkeratosis or parakeratosis on a Papanicolaou smear are not associated with an increased histologic or colposcopic detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The significance of a cytologic diagnosis of hyperkeratosis or parakeratosis on a Papanicolaou smear reported as negative is unknown. We conducted a review of 170 women without uterine descensus who presented to Tripler Army Medical Center cervical clinic with a negative Papanicolaou smear but with hyperkeratosis or parakeratosis noted on the slide. All patients underwent colposcopy, and 64% had either cervical punch biopsy or endocervical curettage. Six women (3.5%) had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia documented histopathologically. We conclude that the cellular findings of hyperkeratosis or parakeratosis on a Papanicolaou smear are not associated with an increased histologic or colposcopic detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The significance of a cytologic diagnosis of hyperkeratosis or parakeratosis on a Papanicolaou smear reported as negative is unknown. We conducted a review of 170 women without uterine descensus who presented to Tripler Army Medical Center cervical clinic with a negative Papanicolaou smear but with hyperkeratosis or parakeratosis noted on the slide. All patients underwent colposcopy, and 64% had either cervical punch biopsy or endocervical curettage. Six women (3.5%) had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia documented histopathologically. We conclude that the cellular findings of hyperkeratosis or parakeratosis on a Papanicolaou smear are not associated with an increased histologic or colposcopic detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Key concepts: Parakeratosis, Medicine, Papanicolaou stain, Hyperkeratosis, Dyskeratosis, Colposcopy, Endocervical curettage, Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The significance of a negative Papanicolaou smear with hyperkeratosis or parakeratosis. — Research Paper | ScholarLens