A quantitative analysis of the role of experience in the regulation of sexual behavior in male rats
Pablo E. Cruz‐Casallas, Luciano Freitas Felício, Antonia G. Nasello
Abstract
Open-access reader
Pablo E. Cruz‐Casallas, Luciano Freitas Felício, Antonia G. Nasello
Abstract
Open-access reader
The effects of repeated sexual behavior tests in male rats were assessed. Training (seven times, 5 days apart) revealed significant decreases in latencies to the first mount, first intromission, ejaculation, postejaculatory mount, and postejaculatory intromission, the total number of mounts, and mount frequency. The number of intromissions before ejaculation did not show differences among the seven observations. In addition, the percentage of animals that ejaculated did not change. Indices of copulatory efficiency and sexual activity were influenced by training. Both increased, but different numbers of sessions were required. Variability decreased among sessions, which increased homogeneity. Our results indicate that training (i.e., the number of test sessions) affects male sexual behavior and, therefore, should be taken into consideration when analyzing facilitatory or inhibitory influences.
OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The effects of repeated sexual behavior tests in male rats were assessed. Training (seven times, 5 days apart) revealed significant decreases in latencies to the first mount, first intromission, ejaculation, postejaculatory mount, and postejaculatory intromission, the total number of mounts, and mount frequency. The number of intromissions before ejaculation did not show differences among the seven observations. In addition, the percentage of animals that ejaculated did not change. Indices of copulatory efficiency and sexual activity were influenced by training. Both increased, but different numbers of sessions were required. Variability decreased among sessions, which increased homogeneity. Our results indicate that training (i.e., the number of test sessions) affects male sexual behavior and, therefore, should be taken into consideration when analyzing facilitatory or inhibitory influences.
Key concepts: Ejaculation, Sexual behavior, Psychology, Mount, Developmental psychology, Physiology, Audiology, Internal medicine