2008South African Law JournalRequires access

Reconsidering Carmichele : notes

Anton Fagan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The aim of this note is to reconsider the Constitutional Court's judgment in the case of Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security & another (Centre for Applied Legal Studies Intervening) 2001 (4) SA 938 (CC) (hereafter Carmichele (CC)). The note focuses on the Constitutional Court's judgment, not in isolation, but rather in the context of the Supreme Court of Appeal judgments that preceded and succeeded it (Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security & another 2001 (1) SA 489 (SCA) (the first judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeal, or Carmichele 2001 (SCA)) and Minister of Safety and Security & another v Carmichele 2004 (3) SA 305 (SCA) (its second judgment, or Carmichele 2004 (SCA)).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The aim of this note is to reconsider the Constitutional Court's judgment in the case of Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security & another (Centre for Applied Legal Studies Intervening) 2001 (4) SA 938 (CC) (hereafter Carmichele (CC)). The note focuses on the Constitutional Court's judgment, not in isolation, but rather in the context of the Supreme Court of Appeal judgments that preceded and succeeded it (Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security & another 2001 (1) SA 489 (SCA) (the first judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeal, or Carmichele 2001 (SCA)) and Minister of Safety and Security & another v Carmichele 2004 (3) SA 305 (SCA) (its second judgment, or Carmichele 2004 (SCA)).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The aim of this note is to reconsider the Constitutional Court's judgment in the case of Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security & another (Centre for Applied Legal Studies Intervening) 2001 (4) SA 938 (CC) (hereafter Carmichele (CC)). The note focuses on the Constitutional Court's judgment, not in isolation, but rather in the context of the Supreme Court of Appeal judgments that preceded and succeeded it (Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security & another 2001 (1) SA 489 (SCA) (the first judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeal, or Carmichele 2001 (SCA)) and Minister of Safety and Security & another v Carmichele 2004 (3) SA 305 (SCA) (its second judgment, or Carmichele 2004 (SCA)).

Key concepts: Appeal, Law, Supreme court, Context (archaeology), Political science, High Court, Constitutional court, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reconsidering Carmichele : notes — Research Paper | ScholarLens