1997PubMedRequires access

Dispelling managed care myths.

Mead Jennings, Cathy Sullivan Clark

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

A number of ideas regarding managed care and capitation are commonly accepted as truths. In reality, however, these ideas are half-truths or myths. Healthcare providers need to challenge some of these myths in order to respond proactively to change. Some of the traditional thinking about managed care that needs realignment includes the belief that PHOs essentially are transitional vehicles and not viable, long-term solutions; that the incentives under fee-for-service payment conflict totally with the incentives under capitation; that under global capitation, the best method for paying primary care physicians is capitation and the best way to pay specialists is discounted fee-for-service; and that small, exclusive physician panels are the most successful for managed care.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A number of ideas regarding managed care and capitation are commonly accepted as truths. In reality, however, these ideas are half-truths or myths. Healthcare providers need to challenge some of these myths in order to respond proactively to change. Some of the traditional thinking about managed care that needs realignment includes the belief that PHOs essentially are transitional vehicles and not viable, long-term solutions; that the incentives under fee-for-service payment conflict totally with the incentives under capitation; that under global capitation, the best method for paying primary care physicians is capitation and the best way to pay specialists is discounted fee-for-service; and that small, exclusive physician panels are the most successful for managed care.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A number of ideas regarding managed care and capitation are commonly accepted as truths. In reality, however, these ideas are half-truths or myths. Healthcare providers need to challenge some of these myths in order to respond proactively to change. Some of the traditional thinking about managed care that needs realignment includes the belief that PHOs essentially are transitional vehicles and not viable, long-term solutions; that the incentives under fee-for-service payment conflict totally with the incentives under capitation; that under global capitation, the best method for paying primary care physicians is capitation and the best way to pay specialists is discounted fee-for-service; and that small, exclusive physician panels are the most successful for managed care.

Key concepts: Capitation, Managed care, Incentive, Payment, Business, Fee-for-service, Capitation fee, Order (exchange)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dispelling managed care myths. — Research Paper | ScholarLens