2002•Unpublished venueRequires access

Basic Characteristics of FIFO Packet Switches

Peter Homan, Andrej Kos

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

In this paper we compare characteristics of different FIFO packet switch types. In accordance with our expectations, the best results are obtained by using the output-queued packet switches. The main drawback of these switches is the need for a fast switching fabric. This can be avoided by using the input-queued packet switches, whose performance depends upon individual packet sizes. Characteristics of the input-queued packet switches are similar to those of the output-queued packet switches; if fixed-size packets are transferred, the consequences of the output-contention problem are relatively small. Transfer of the variable-size packets in the input-queued switches is more complicated. Practically, a 100% throughput can be achieved if an asynchronous switching fabric is applied. Packet delays are in this case comparable to those in the output-queued packet switches. The drawback of such switches is the inability to differentiate among multiple service classes. On the other hand, by using a synchronous switching fabric, a 100% switch throughput of cannot be achieved. Another disadvantage of the synchronous packet switches are relatively high packet delays. However, usage of such switches enables a differentiation between multiple service classes, that is one of the conditions for enabling quality of service.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper we compare characteristics of different FIFO packet switch types. In accordance with our expectations, the best results are obtained by using the output-queued packet switches. The main drawback of these switches is the need for a fast switching fabric. This can be avoided by using the input-queued packet switches, whose performance depends upon individual packet sizes. Characteristics of the input-queued packet switches are similar to those of the output-queued packet switches; if fixed-size packets are transferred, the consequences of the output-contention problem are relatively small. Transfer of the variable-size packets in the input-queued switches is more complicated. Practically, a 100% throughput can be achieved if an asynchronous switching fabric is applied. Packet delays are in this case comparable to those in the output-queued packet switches. The drawback of such switches is the inability to differentiate among multiple service classes. On the other hand, by using a synchronous switching fabric, a 100% switch throughput of cannot be achieved. Another disadvantage of the synchronous packet switches are relatively high packet delays. However, usage of such switches enables a differentiation between multiple service classes, that is one of the conditions for enabling quality of service.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper we compare characteristics of different FIFO packet switch types. In accordance with our expectations, the best results are obtained by using the output-queued packet switches. The main drawback of these switches is the need for a fast switching fabric. This can be avoided by using the input-queued packet switches, whose performance depends upon individual packet sizes. Characteristics of the input-queued packet switches are similar to those of the output-queued packet switches; if fixed-size packets are transferred, the consequences of the output-contention problem are relatively small. Transfer of the variable-size packets in the input-queued switches is more complicated. Practically, a 100% throughput can be achieved if an asynchronous switching fabric is applied. Packet delays are in this case comparable to those in the output-queued packet switches. The drawback of such switches is the inability to differentiate among multiple service classes. On the other hand, by using a synchronous switching fabric, a 100% switch throughput of cannot be achieved. Another disadvantage of the synchronous packet switches are relatively high packet delays. However, usage of such switches enables a differentiation between multiple service classes, that is one of the conditions for enabling quality of service.

Key concepts: Fast packet switching, Burst switching, Packet generator, Transmission delay, Computer science, Computer network, Network packet, Packet switching

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Basic Characteristics of FIFO Packet Switches — Research Paper | ScholarLens