1992PubMedRequires access

Confounding bias and effect modification in epidemiologic research.

John Ely

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The medical literature contains many studies of the clinical effectiveness of diagnostic tests and therapeutic interventions. Common problems in experimental design occur that influence the usefulness of original research. Confounding bias and effect modification are two important factors that affect whether clinicians ought to apply the findings of clinical research to the care of their patients. Investigators should minimize confounding biases in their work. Effect modification should be described so that readers can decide which of their patients will benefit from a particular study. This article uses a number of clinical examples to help the clinician and investigator understand the influences of bias and effect modification on clinical research.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The medical literature contains many studies of the clinical effectiveness of diagnostic tests and therapeutic interventions. Common problems in experimental design occur that influence the usefulness of original research. Confounding bias and effect modification are two important factors that affect whether clinicians ought to apply the findings of clinical research to the care of their patients. Investigators should minimize confounding biases in their work. Effect modification should be described so that readers can decide which of their patients will benefit from a particular study. This article uses a number of clinical examples to help the clinician and investigator understand the influences of bias and effect modification on clinical research.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The medical literature contains many studies of the clinical effectiveness of diagnostic tests and therapeutic interventions. Common problems in experimental design occur that influence the usefulness of original research. Confounding bias and effect modification are two important factors that affect whether clinicians ought to apply the findings of clinical research to the care of their patients. Investigators should minimize confounding biases in their work. Effect modification should be described so that readers can decide which of their patients will benefit from a particular study. This article uses a number of clinical examples to help the clinician and investigator understand the influences of bias and effect modification on clinical research.

Key concepts: Confounding, Effect modification, Psychological intervention, Affect (linguistics), Medicine, Clinical research, Psychology, Clinical psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Confounding bias and effect modification in epidemiologic research. — Research Paper | ScholarLens