A cultural consensus analysis of marine ecological knowledge in the Solomon Islands
Kevin L. Grant, Marc L. Miller
Abstract
Kevin L. Grant, Marc L. Miller
Abstract
Scientific interest in “local” or “traditional” marine knowledge and its applications in fishery and resource management have fostered linkages between the fields of marine biology and cultural anthropology. Ethnographic techniques are useful for investigating local knowledge structures, but these methods are time-consuming. In partial remedy, this paper promotes the technique of cultural consensus analysis. This Solomon Island case study focuses on ecological knowledge regarding the Arnavon Marine Conservation Area (AMCA) and marine areas that are not officially regulated (gazetted). Study respondents reside in the Isabel Island communities of Poro, Guguha, Kia and Allardyce. Results confirm that there are two bodies of marine ecological knowledge for the marine areas in question with two compatible sets of “culturally correct” answers to the ecological propositions of interest. Findings have potential value in the Solomon Island marine protected area context for their significance with regards to communication, resource assessment, human resources, and resource management. Cultural consensus analysis promises to be of methodological value to marine protected area and fishery managers elsewhere, and can support a variety of management and conservation endeavors attuned to the ideal of sustainable development.
OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Scientific interest in “local” or “traditional” marine knowledge and its applications in fishery and resource management have fostered linkages between the fields of marine biology and cultural anthropology. Ethnographic techniques are useful for investigating local knowledge structures, but these methods are time-consuming. In partial remedy, this paper promotes the technique of cultural consensus analysis. This Solomon Island case study focuses on ecological knowledge regarding the Arnavon Marine Conservation Area (AMCA) and marine areas that are not officially regulated (gazetted). Study respondents reside in the Isabel Island communities of Poro, Guguha, Kia and Allardyce. Results confirm that there are two bodies of marine ecological knowledge for the marine areas in question with two compatible sets of “culturally correct” answers to the ecological propositions of interest. Findings have potential value in the Solomon Island marine protected area context for their significance with regards to communication, resource assessment, human resources, and resource management. Cultural consensus analysis promises to be of methodological value to marine protected area and fishery managers elsewhere, and can support a variety of management and conservation endeavors attuned to the ideal of sustainable development.
Key concepts: Marine conservation, Context (archaeology), Resource (disambiguation), Marine protected area, Ethnography, Geography, Traditional knowledge, Environmental resource management