2004Unpublished venueRequires access

A cultural consensus analysis of marine ecological knowledge in the Solomon Islands

Kevin L. Grant, Marc L. Miller

Open publisher page 29 citations

Abstract

Scientific interest in “local” or “traditional” marine knowledge and its applications in fishery and resource management have fostered linkages between the fields of marine biology and cultural anthropology. Ethnographic techniques are useful for investigating local knowledge structures, but these methods are time-consuming. In partial remedy, this paper promotes the technique of cultural consensus analysis. This Solomon Island case study focuses on ecological knowledge regarding the Arnavon Marine Conservation Area (AMCA) and marine areas that are not officially regulated (gazetted). Study respondents reside in the Isabel Island communities of Poro, Guguha, Kia and Allardyce. Results confirm that there are two bodies of marine ecological knowledge for the marine areas in question with two compatible sets of “culturally correct” answers to the ecological propositions of interest. Findings have potential value in the Solomon Island marine protected area context for their significance with regards to communication, resource assessment, human resources, and resource management. Cultural consensus analysis promises to be of methodological value to marine protected area and fishery managers elsewhere, and can support a variety of management and conservation endeavors attuned to the ideal of sustainable development.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Scientific interest in “local” or “traditional” marine knowledge and its applications in fishery and resource management have fostered linkages between the fields of marine biology and cultural anthropology. Ethnographic techniques are useful for investigating local knowledge structures, but these methods are time-consuming. In partial remedy, this paper promotes the technique of cultural consensus analysis. This Solomon Island case study focuses on ecological knowledge regarding the Arnavon Marine Conservation Area (AMCA) and marine areas that are not officially regulated (gazetted). Study respondents reside in the Isabel Island communities of Poro, Guguha, Kia and Allardyce. Results confirm that there are two bodies of marine ecological knowledge for the marine areas in question with two compatible sets of “culturally correct” answers to the ecological propositions of interest. Findings have potential value in the Solomon Island marine protected area context for their significance with regards to communication, resource assessment, human resources, and resource management. Cultural consensus analysis promises to be of methodological value to marine protected area and fishery managers elsewhere, and can support a variety of management and conservation endeavors attuned to the ideal of sustainable development.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Scientific interest in “local” or “traditional” marine knowledge and its applications in fishery and resource management have fostered linkages between the fields of marine biology and cultural anthropology. Ethnographic techniques are useful for investigating local knowledge structures, but these methods are time-consuming. In partial remedy, this paper promotes the technique of cultural consensus analysis. This Solomon Island case study focuses on ecological knowledge regarding the Arnavon Marine Conservation Area (AMCA) and marine areas that are not officially regulated (gazetted). Study respondents reside in the Isabel Island communities of Poro, Guguha, Kia and Allardyce. Results confirm that there are two bodies of marine ecological knowledge for the marine areas in question with two compatible sets of “culturally correct” answers to the ecological propositions of interest. Findings have potential value in the Solomon Island marine protected area context for their significance with regards to communication, resource assessment, human resources, and resource management. Cultural consensus analysis promises to be of methodological value to marine protected area and fishery managers elsewhere, and can support a variety of management and conservation endeavors attuned to the ideal of sustainable development.

Key concepts: Marine conservation, Context (archaeology), Resource (disambiguation), Marine protected area, Ethnography, Geography, Traditional knowledge, Environmental resource management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A cultural consensus analysis of marine ecological knowledge in the Solomon Islands — Research Paper | ScholarLens