1994Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Requires access

American Leadership Potential in the Post-Cold War World

Donald J Kassilke

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

For roughly fifty years since the end of World War II the United States, has provided global leadership to the West and western-aligned nations of the world. The enabling factors of this leadership were direct results of the war. These factors included the political and economic ruin of Europe and Asia, the overwhelming industrial/economic strength and political stability of the U. S. relative to the rest of the world and the need for a U.S. economic, political and military umbrella in the face of an ideologically antithetical and militarily potent Soviet Union. In short, the U.S. has led the western world because it possessed the resources and interest to do so and because of the western perception of a common threat. However, with the demise of communism as a viable ideology and the disintegration of the Soviet Union, critics of the American leadership role are speaking with an increasingly loud, if not unified, voice. What then should be the role of the United States at the turn of the 21st century? The premise of this paper is that it is in the United States' interest, and indeed the world's, for America to pursue the leadership role. United States' leadership of the post-Cold War world is not, however, an inevitability. The questions that must be answered are therefore twofold. First, is America in decline, will it have the power resources to lead? Second, what is the developing structure of the world order and is it conducive to U.S. leadership

About this research paper

What this paper is about

For roughly fifty years since the end of World War II the United States, has provided global leadership to the West and western-aligned nations of the world. The enabling factors of this leadership were direct results of the war. These factors included the political and economic ruin of Europe and Asia, the overwhelming industrial/economic strength and political stability of the U. S. relative to the rest of the world and the need for a U.S. economic, political and military umbrella in the face of an ideologically antithetical and militarily potent Soviet Union. In short, the U.S. has led the western world because it possessed the resources and interest to do so and because of the western perception of a common threat. However, with the demise of communism as a viable ideology and the disintegration of the Soviet Union, critics of the American leadership role are speaking with an increasingly loud, if not unified, voice. What then should be the role of the United States at the turn of the 21st century? The premise of this paper is that it is in the United States' interest, and indeed the world's, for America to pursue the leadership role. United States' leadership of the post-Cold War world is not, however, an inevitability. The questions that must be answered are therefore twofold. First, is America in decline, will it have the power resources to lead? Second, what is the developing structure of the world order and is it conducive to U.S. leadership

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

For roughly fifty years since the end of World War II the United States, has provided global leadership to the West and western-aligned nations of the world. The enabling factors of this leadership were direct results of the war. These factors included the political and economic ruin of Europe and Asia, the overwhelming industrial/economic strength and political stability of the U. S. relative to the rest of the world and the need for a U.S. economic, political and military umbrella in the face of an ideologically antithetical and militarily potent Soviet Union. In short, the U.S. has led the western world because it possessed the resources and interest to do so and because of the western perception of a common threat. However, with the demise of communism as a viable ideology and the disintegration of the Soviet Union, critics of the American leadership role are speaking with an increasingly loud, if not unified, voice. What then should be the role of the United States at the turn of the 21st century? The premise of this paper is that it is in the United States' interest, and indeed the world's, for America to pursue the leadership role. United States' leadership of the post-Cold War world is not, however, an inevitability. The questions that must be answered are therefore twofold. First, is America in decline, will it have the power resources to lead? Second, what is the developing structure of the world order and is it conducive to U.S. leadership

Key concepts: Demise, Ideology, Politics, Political science, Communism, Political economy, World War II, Power (physics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
American Leadership Potential in the Post-Cold War World — Research Paper | ScholarLens