2025Obstetrical & Gynecological SurveyRequires access

The Clinical Utility of Measures of Ovarian Reserve

Katherine M. Baker, Rodolfo Fernandez‐Criado, Jennifer L. Eaton, Virginia Mensah

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Importance: Measures of ovarian reserve, particularly anti-Müllerian hormone, have been increasingly and inaccurately utilized as "fertility tests." It is important to understand the available measures of ovarian reserve and how to appropriately interpret and integrate their use into clinical practice. Objectives: The objectives of this article are to review the process of reproductive aging, define ovarian reserve, describe the available measures of ovarian reserve, and discuss the clinical utility of these measures. Evidence Acquisition: A literature search was performed using the electronic database PubMed. Relevant guidelines, systematic reviews, and original research articles investigating ovarian reserve parameters and their clinical utility were reviewed. Results: The fecundity of women gradually declines with increasing reproductive age as oocyte quantity and quality decline. Ovarian reserve is defined as the quantity of oocytes remaining in the ovary. Ovarian reserve can be measured indirectly with the use of serum blood tests or ultrasound imaging. Measures of ovarian reserve are clinically useful in several circumstances, particularly for use during fertility treatment and cycles of assisted reproductive technology. However, measures of ovarian reserve are poor predictors of reproductive potential and should not be used as "fertility tests." Conclusions and Relevance: Measures of ovarian reserve are poor predictors of reproductive potential and should not be used as "fertility tests." Age remains a stronger predictor of reproductive success than measures of ovarian reserve.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Importance: Measures of ovarian reserve, particularly anti-Müllerian hormone, have been increasingly and inaccurately utilized as "fertility tests." It is important to understand the available measures of ovarian reserve and how to appropriately interpret and integrate their use into clinical practice. Objectives: The objectives of this article are to review the process of reproductive aging, define ovarian reserve, describe the available measures of ovarian reserve, and discuss the clinical utility of these measures. Evidence Acquisition: A literature search was performed using the electronic database PubMed. Relevant guidelines, systematic reviews, and original research articles investigating ovarian reserve parameters and their clinical utility were reviewed. Results: The fecundity of women gradually declines with increasing reproductive age as oocyte quantity and quality decline. Ovarian reserve is defined as the quantity of oocytes remaining in the ovary. Ovarian reserve can be measured indirectly with the use of serum blood tests or ultrasound imaging. Measures of ovarian reserve are clinically useful in several circumstances, particularly for use during fertility treatment and cycles of assisted reproductive technology. However, measures of ovarian reserve are poor predictors of reproductive potential and should not be used as "fertility tests." Conclusions and Relevance: Measures of ovarian reserve are poor predictors of reproductive potential and should not be used as "fertility tests." Age remains a stronger predictor of reproductive success than measures of ovarian reserve.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Importance: Measures of ovarian reserve, particularly anti-Müllerian hormone, have been increasingly and inaccurately utilized as "fertility tests." It is important to understand the available measures of ovarian reserve and how to appropriately interpret and integrate their use into clinical practice. Objectives: The objectives of this article are to review the process of reproductive aging, define ovarian reserve, describe the available measures of ovarian reserve, and discuss the clinical utility of these measures. Evidence Acquisition: A literature search was performed using the electronic database PubMed. Relevant guidelines, systematic reviews, and original research articles investigating ovarian reserve parameters and their clinical utility were reviewed. Results: The fecundity of women gradually declines with increasing reproductive age as oocyte quantity and quality decline. Ovarian reserve is defined as the quantity of oocytes remaining in the ovary. Ovarian reserve can be measured indirectly with the use of serum blood tests or ultrasound imaging. Measures of ovarian reserve are clinically useful in several circumstances, particularly for use during fertility treatment and cycles of assisted reproductive technology. However, measures of ovarian reserve are poor predictors of reproductive potential and should not be used as "fertility tests." Conclusions and Relevance: Measures of ovarian reserve are poor predictors of reproductive potential and should not be used as "fertility tests." Age remains a stronger predictor of reproductive success than measures of ovarian reserve.

Key concepts: Ovarian reserve, Medicine, Fertility, Fecundity, Anti-Müllerian hormone, Gynecology, Infertility, Hormone

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Clinical Utility of Measures of Ovarian Reserve — Research Paper | ScholarLens