2024International PoliticsOpen access

Redefining the status quo state: collective support, order-maintenance, and self-restraint

Petar Popović

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

The concept of the status quo state within international relations (IRs) has garnered less scholarly attention compared to the concept of the revisionist state. Traditionally, status quo states are portrayed as defensive and cooperative actors that uphold established international norms. However, their potential for interventionism and offensive behavior has been largely overlooked. By situating the concept of the status quo state within the context of normative orders from the eighteenth to the twentieth century, this article proposes three key indicators for its conceptual identification: seeking ‘collective support’ to legitimize their actions against perceived or actual revisionist threats; pursuing a clearly defined goal of ‘order-maintenance’ by restoring regional and/or global normative orders; and exhibiting ‘self-restraint,’ not necessarily by limiting the use of force, but by restricting the objectives of such force to preserving international order. This analytical framework aims to provide a more nuanced understanding of the complexities of states’ status quo-seeking in both regional and global contexts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The concept of the status quo state within international relations (IRs) has garnered less scholarly attention compared to the concept of the revisionist state. Traditionally, status quo states are portrayed as defensive and cooperative actors that uphold established international norms. However, their potential for interventionism and offensive behavior has been largely overlooked. By situating the concept of the status quo state within the context of normative orders from the eighteenth to the twentieth century, this article proposes three key indicators for its conceptual identification: seeking ‘collective support’ to legitimize their actions against perceived or actual revisionist threats; pursuing a clearly defined goal of ‘order-maintenance’ by restoring regional and/or global normative orders; and exhibiting ‘self-restraint,’ not necessarily by limiting the use of force, but by restricting the objectives of such force to preserving international order. This analytical framework aims to provide a more nuanced understanding of the complexities of states’ status quo-seeking in both regional and global contexts.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The concept of the status quo state within international relations (IRs) has garnered less scholarly attention compared to the concept of the revisionist state. Traditionally, status quo states are portrayed as defensive and cooperative actors that uphold established international norms. However, their potential for interventionism and offensive behavior has been largely overlooked. By situating the concept of the status quo state within the context of normative orders from the eighteenth to the twentieth century, this article proposes three key indicators for its conceptual identification: seeking ‘collective support’ to legitimize their actions against perceived or actual revisionist threats; pursuing a clearly defined goal of ‘order-maintenance’ by restoring regional and/or global normative orders; and exhibiting ‘self-restraint,’ not necessarily by limiting the use of force, but by restricting the objectives of such force to preserving international order. This analytical framework aims to provide a more nuanced understanding of the complexities of states’ status quo-seeking in both regional and global contexts.

Key concepts: Collective security, Status quo, International political economy, State (computer science), Order (exchange), International relations, Political science, International studies

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Redefining the status quo state: collective support, order-maintenance, and self-restraint — Research Paper | ScholarLens