2024•PLoS ONEOpen access

Optimizing plastic film mulch to improve the yield and water use efficiency of dryland maize in the Loess Plateau, China

Rui Zhang, Hongjuan Zhang, Yunpeng Xing, Lian Xue

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Knowledge on the variation of yield and water use efficiency under different mulching methods is important for guiding rained maize production in the Loess Plateau area. In this study, eight different plastic film mulching methods was established to analyze the maize growth, soil water content and soil temperature changes of dryland maize, and increase yield and water use efficiency (WUE). The field experiment was conducted in 2019, and eight treatments were set up, including a traditional flat planting without mulching (CK), ridge-furrow with ridges mulching black plastic film and furrows mulching straw (HJ), ridge-furrow with ridges mulching black plastic film and furrows bare (HL), ridge-furrow with ridges mulching liquid plastic film and furrows mulching straw (YJ), ridge-furrow with ridges mulching liquid plastic film and furrows bare (YL), ridge-furrow with ridges mulching biodegradable plastic film and furrows mulching straw (SJ), ridge-furrow with ridges mulching biodegradable plastic film and furrows bare (SL) and ridge-furrow with ridges bare and furrows mulching straw (NJ). Furthermore, the AHP-TOPSIS was employed to evaluate the optimal mulching method for maize. The results showed that compared with CK and NJ treatment, the soil water content and soil storage were significantly changes with other treatments in the reproductive period of maize. Among the six mulching methods, maize yield in HJ, HL, YJ, YL, SJ, and SL treatments were 46.28%, 61.95%, 70.30%, 51.02%, 52.02% and 53.53% significantly greater than CK treatment. In addition, dryland maize WUE was 66.53% and 84.01% higher in the YJ and YL treatments with ridges mulching liquid plastic film than in the CK treatment, respectively. The optimal treatments of economic benefits were YL and HJ. Through AHP-TOPSIS comprehensive analysis, the optimal mulching methods were YL and HJ treatment. Current field trials indicate that YL treatment could serve as a promising option to improve dryland maize yield, WUE, and reducing environmental risks in the Loess Plateau of China.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Knowledge on the variation of yield and water use efficiency under different mulching methods is important for guiding rained maize production in the Loess Plateau area. In this study, eight different plastic film mulching methods was established to analyze the maize growth, soil water content and soil temperature changes of dryland maize, and increase yield and water use efficiency (WUE). The field experiment was conducted in 2019, and eight treatments were set up, including a traditional flat planting without mulching (CK), ridge-furrow with ridges mulching black plastic film and furrows mulching straw (HJ), ridge-furrow with ridges mulching black plastic film and furrows bare (HL), ridge-furrow with ridges mulching liquid plastic film and furrows mulching straw (YJ), ridge-furrow with ridges mulching liquid plastic film and furrows bare (YL), ridge-furrow with ridges mulching biodegradable plastic film and furrows mulching straw (SJ), ridge-furrow with ridges mulching biodegradable plastic film and furrows bare (SL) and ridge-furrow with ridges bare and furrows mulching straw (NJ). Furthermore, the AHP-TOPSIS was employed to evaluate the optimal mulching method for maize. The results showed that compared with CK and NJ treatment, the soil water content and soil storage were significantly changes with other treatments in the reproductive period of maize. Among the six mulching methods, maize yield in HJ, HL, YJ, YL, SJ, and SL treatments were 46.28%, 61.95%, 70.30%, 51.02%, 52.02% and 53.53% significantly greater than CK treatment. In addition, dryland maize WUE was 66.53% and 84.01% higher in the YJ and YL treatments with ridges mulching liquid plastic film than in the CK treatment, respectively. The optimal treatments of economic benefits were YL and HJ. Through AHP-TOPSIS comprehensive analysis, the optimal mulching methods were YL and HJ treatment. Current field trials indicate that YL treatment could serve as a promising option to improve dryland maize yield, WUE, and reducing environmental risks in the Loess Plateau of China.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Knowledge on the variation of yield and water use efficiency under different mulching methods is important for guiding rained maize production in the Loess Plateau area. In this study, eight different plastic film mulching methods was established to analyze the maize growth, soil water content and soil temperature changes of dryland maize, and increase yield and water use efficiency (WUE). The field experiment was conducted in 2019, and eight treatments were set up, including a traditional flat planting without mulching (CK), ridge-furrow with ridges mulching black plastic film and furrows mulching straw (HJ), ridge-furrow with ridges mulching black plastic film and furrows bare (HL), ridge-furrow with ridges mulching liquid plastic film and furrows mulching straw (YJ), ridge-furrow with ridges mulching liquid plastic film and furrows bare (YL), ridge-furrow with ridges mulching biodegradable plastic film and furrows mulching straw (SJ), ridge-furrow with ridges mulching biodegradable plastic film and furrows bare (SL) and ridge-furrow with ridges bare and furrows mulching straw (NJ). Furthermore, the AHP-TOPSIS was employed to evaluate the optimal mulching method for maize. The results showed that compared with CK and NJ treatment, the soil water content and soil storage were significantly changes with other treatments in the reproductive period of maize. Among the six mulching methods, maize yield in HJ, HL, YJ, YL, SJ, and SL treatments were 46.28%, 61.95%, 70.30%, 51.02%, 52.02% and 53.53% significantly greater than CK treatment. In addition, dryland maize WUE was 66.53% and 84.01% higher in the YJ and YL treatments with ridges mulching liquid plastic film than in the CK treatment, respectively. The optimal treatments of economic benefits were YL and HJ. Through AHP-TOPSIS comprehensive analysis, the optimal mulching methods were YL and HJ treatment. Current field trials indicate that YL treatment could serve as a promising option to improve dryland maize yield, WUE, and reducing environmental risks in the Loess Plateau of China.

Key concepts: Mulch, Straw, Agronomy, Dryland farming, Plastic film, Water-use efficiency, Ridge, Environmental science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Optimizing plastic film mulch to improve the yield and water use efficiency of dryland maize in the Loess Plateau, China — Research Paper | ScholarLens