2024Current anesthesiology reportsOpen access

The Role of Cricoid Pressure in Rapid Sequence Induction

T. Ali, Kariem El‐Boghdadly

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of the Review This review summarizes current knowledge regarding cricoid pressure in rapid sequence induction. It assesses anatomical concepts, current practice, guidance, evidence of safety and efficacy, and future directions. Recent Findings Guidelines have variable recommendations for cricoid pressure, and surveys underscore this variation in practice. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that cricoid pressure may be associated with worse views at direct laryngoscopy, but there is currently no robust data demonstrating that cricoid pressure reduces the risk of pulmonary aspiration. However, evidence demonstrates that correct anatomical localization of the cricoid cartilage is inaccurate without the use of ultrasound, and therefore most of the existing evidence is currently unreliable regarding true efficacy. Moreover, the widespread use of videolaryngoscopy means that worsening views at laryngoscopy might be less of a concern than previously thought. Summary Current literature and global practice suggest that it is a clinician’s decision based on individual patient risks, and that cricoid pressure—as it is currently performed—likely provides no benefit but probably does minimal clinically relevant harm. The role of accurate cricoid cartilage localization and videolaryngoscopy remains to be fully investigated.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Purpose of the Review This review summarizes current knowledge regarding cricoid pressure in rapid sequence induction. It assesses anatomical concepts, current practice, guidance, evidence of safety and efficacy, and future directions. Recent Findings Guidelines have variable recommendations for cricoid pressure, and surveys underscore this variation in practice. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that cricoid pressure may be associated with worse views at direct laryngoscopy, but there is currently no robust data demonstrating that cricoid pressure reduces the risk of pulmonary aspiration. However, evidence demonstrates that correct anatomical localization of the cricoid cartilage is inaccurate without the use of ultrasound, and therefore most of the existing evidence is currently unreliable regarding true efficacy. Moreover, the widespread use of videolaryngoscopy means that worsening views at laryngoscopy might be less of a concern than previously thought. Summary Current literature and global practice suggest that it is a clinician’s decision based on individual patient risks, and that cricoid pressure—as it is currently performed—likely provides no benefit but probably does minimal clinically relevant harm. The role of accurate cricoid cartilage localization and videolaryngoscopy remains to be fully investigated.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Purpose of the Review This review summarizes current knowledge regarding cricoid pressure in rapid sequence induction. It assesses anatomical concepts, current practice, guidance, evidence of safety and efficacy, and future directions. Recent Findings Guidelines have variable recommendations for cricoid pressure, and surveys underscore this variation in practice. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that cricoid pressure may be associated with worse views at direct laryngoscopy, but there is currently no robust data demonstrating that cricoid pressure reduces the risk of pulmonary aspiration. However, evidence demonstrates that correct anatomical localization of the cricoid cartilage is inaccurate without the use of ultrasound, and therefore most of the existing evidence is currently unreliable regarding true efficacy. Moreover, the widespread use of videolaryngoscopy means that worsening views at laryngoscopy might be less of a concern than previously thought. Summary Current literature and global practice suggest that it is a clinician’s decision based on individual patient risks, and that cricoid pressure—as it is currently performed—likely provides no benefit but probably does minimal clinically relevant harm. The role of accurate cricoid cartilage localization and videolaryngoscopy remains to be fully investigated.

Key concepts: Cricoid pressure, Cricoid cartilage, Rapid sequence induction, Medicine, Laryngoscopy, Anesthesiology, Intensive care medicine, Intubation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Role of Cricoid Pressure in Rapid Sequence Induction — Research Paper | ScholarLens