2024Cyber Security and ApplicationsOpen access

A survey on scalable consensus algorithms for blockchain technology

Ankit Jain, Nishant Gupta, Brij B. Gupta

Open full text 66 citations

Abstract

The process of reaching an agreement on a value within a distributed network, known as a consensus problem, is a defining feature of blockchain. This consensus problem can be seen in various applications like load balancing, transaction validation in blockchain, and distributed computing. In recent years, many researchers have provided solutions to this problem. Hence we have presented a survey in which we delved into blockchain consensus algorithms and conducted a comparative analysis of all the consensus algorithms to provide information about each protocol’s advantages and drawbacks. This survey starts with the standard proof-of-work consensus protocol applied in bitcoin cryptocurrency and its limitations on the ground of the following parameters: throughput (transactions per second), latency, forks, fault tolerance, double spending attacks, and power consumption. The rest of the consensus algorithms in this paper have been systematically covered to address the limitations of proof-of-work. This paper also covered Raft and PBFT consensus algorithms suitable for permissioned networks. Although the PBFT consensus protocol has a high throughput and a low latency, it has limited node scalability. The PBFT has a low byzantine fault tolerant rate. This paper also covers PoEWAL for blockchain-based IoT applications and WBFT, which prevents corrupt nodes from taking part in consensus. A comparative analysis of the consensus algorithms provides an explicit knowledge of the present research, which also offers guidance for future study.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The process of reaching an agreement on a value within a distributed network, known as a consensus problem, is a defining feature of blockchain. This consensus problem can be seen in various applications like load balancing, transaction validation in blockchain, and distributed computing. In recent years, many researchers have provided solutions to this problem. Hence we have presented a survey in which we delved into blockchain consensus algorithms and conducted a comparative analysis of all the consensus algorithms to provide information about each protocol’s advantages and drawbacks. This survey starts with the standard proof-of-work consensus protocol applied in bitcoin cryptocurrency and its limitations on the ground of the following parameters: throughput (transactions per second), latency, forks, fault tolerance, double spending attacks, and power consumption. The rest of the consensus algorithms in this paper have been systematically covered to address the limitations of proof-of-work. This paper also covered Raft and PBFT consensus algorithms suitable for permissioned networks. Although the PBFT consensus protocol has a high throughput and a low latency, it has limited node scalability. The PBFT has a low byzantine fault tolerant rate. This paper also covers PoEWAL for blockchain-based IoT applications and WBFT, which prevents corrupt nodes from taking part in consensus. A comparative analysis of the consensus algorithms provides an explicit knowledge of the present research, which also offers guidance for future study.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 66 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The process of reaching an agreement on a value within a distributed network, known as a consensus problem, is a defining feature of blockchain. This consensus problem can be seen in various applications like load balancing, transaction validation in blockchain, and distributed computing. In recent years, many researchers have provided solutions to this problem. Hence we have presented a survey in which we delved into blockchain consensus algorithms and conducted a comparative analysis of all the consensus algorithms to provide information about each protocol’s advantages and drawbacks. This survey starts with the standard proof-of-work consensus protocol applied in bitcoin cryptocurrency and its limitations on the ground of the following parameters: throughput (transactions per second), latency, forks, fault tolerance, double spending attacks, and power consumption. The rest of the consensus algorithms in this paper have been systematically covered to address the limitations of proof-of-work. This paper also covered Raft and PBFT consensus algorithms suitable for permissioned networks. Although the PBFT consensus protocol has a high throughput and a low latency, it has limited node scalability. The PBFT has a low byzantine fault tolerant rate. This paper also covers PoEWAL for blockchain-based IoT applications and WBFT, which prevents corrupt nodes from taking part in consensus. A comparative analysis of the consensus algorithms provides an explicit knowledge of the present research, which also offers guidance for future study.

Key concepts: Byzantine fault tolerance, Consensus algorithm, Blockchain, Computer science, Scalability, Consensus, Distributed computing, Protocol (science)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A survey on scalable consensus algorithms for blockchain technology — Research Paper | ScholarLens