2024Thermal Science and Engineering ProgressOpen access

Waste heat recovery of a combined Brayton and inverse Brayton cycle for gas turbine based multi-generation hydrogen and freshwater purposes: 4E comparison with a simple coupled Brayton and inverse Brayton cycle

Mohammad Zoghi, Nasser Hosseinzadeh, Saleh Gharaie, Ali Zare

Open full text 17 citations

Abstract

Using gas turbine cycles in power generation layouts can lead to a significant amount of waste energy. The combined Brayton and inverse Brayton cycle (IBC), which are used in such systems, has a considerable amount of waste energy in the heat rejection stage and exhausted gas, which has not been considered in previous studies. In the present research, a simple coupled Brayton and IBC (Configuration 1) is compared with a multi-generation system (Configuration 2) in which a hot water unit, a thermoelectric generator (TEG), and an absorption chiller are added to Configuration 1 for the waste energy utilization of combined Brayton and IBC. Furthermore, the power produced in IBC and TEG is directed to a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer and a reverse osmosis desalination unit for hydrogen and potable water outputs. Results show that although the total investment cost rate of Configuration 2 is higher than that of Configuration 1, the fuel cost rate, environmental cost rate, and exergy destruction cost rate of Configuration 2 are lower. Furthermore, at the best performance point, Configuration 2 has exergy efficiency and unit cost of products equal to 40.77% and 63.19 $/GJ. They are higher than Configuration 1 by 5% and 2%, respectively. Hence, with Configuration 2, a higher exergy efficiency with a lower fuel consumption and environmental cost rate is accessible.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Using gas turbine cycles in power generation layouts can lead to a significant amount of waste energy. The combined Brayton and inverse Brayton cycle (IBC), which are used in such systems, has a considerable amount of waste energy in the heat rejection stage and exhausted gas, which has not been considered in previous studies. In the present research, a simple coupled Brayton and IBC (Configuration 1) is compared with a multi-generation system (Configuration 2) in which a hot water unit, a thermoelectric generator (TEG), and an absorption chiller are added to Configuration 1 for the waste energy utilization of combined Brayton and IBC. Furthermore, the power produced in IBC and TEG is directed to a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer and a reverse osmosis desalination unit for hydrogen and potable water outputs. Results show that although the total investment cost rate of Configuration 2 is higher than that of Configuration 1, the fuel cost rate, environmental cost rate, and exergy destruction cost rate of Configuration 2 are lower. Furthermore, at the best performance point, Configuration 2 has exergy efficiency and unit cost of products equal to 40.77% and 63.19 $/GJ. They are higher than Configuration 1 by 5% and 2%, respectively. Hence, with Configuration 2, a higher exergy efficiency with a lower fuel consumption and environmental cost rate is accessible.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Using gas turbine cycles in power generation layouts can lead to a significant amount of waste energy. The combined Brayton and inverse Brayton cycle (IBC), which are used in such systems, has a considerable amount of waste energy in the heat rejection stage and exhausted gas, which has not been considered in previous studies. In the present research, a simple coupled Brayton and IBC (Configuration 1) is compared with a multi-generation system (Configuration 2) in which a hot water unit, a thermoelectric generator (TEG), and an absorption chiller are added to Configuration 1 for the waste energy utilization of combined Brayton and IBC. Furthermore, the power produced in IBC and TEG is directed to a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer and a reverse osmosis desalination unit for hydrogen and potable water outputs. Results show that although the total investment cost rate of Configuration 2 is higher than that of Configuration 1, the fuel cost rate, environmental cost rate, and exergy destruction cost rate of Configuration 2 are lower. Furthermore, at the best performance point, Configuration 2 has exergy efficiency and unit cost of products equal to 40.77% and 63.19 $/GJ. They are higher than Configuration 1 by 5% and 2%, respectively. Hence, with Configuration 2, a higher exergy efficiency with a lower fuel consumption and environmental cost rate is accessible.

Key concepts: Brayton cycle, Environmental science, Inverse, Nuclear engineering, Thermodynamics, Turbine, Process engineering, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Waste heat recovery of a combined Brayton and inverse Brayton cycle for gas turbine based multi-generation hydrogen and freshwater purposes: 4E comparison with a simple coupled Brayton and inverse Brayton cycle — Research Paper | ScholarLens