2019International Journal of Contemporary SurgeryRequires access

Is Cartilage Shield Tympanoplasty better than Fascia Tympanoplasty

Anushree Bajaj Shahnaz Sheikh

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Background Temporalis fascia and cartilage are the most commonly used graft materials, though contradictory reports are available in literature as regards their efficacy in Tympanoplasty. The aim of the study was to compare the graft uptake rates and hearing results in case of temporalis fascia and cartilage in type 1 tympanoplasty Material and Method A total of 400 cases with large, subtotal and total perforation were considered in the study. All the selected patients were divided into two groups. Group A in which temporalis fascia graft was used and including 200 cases and cartilage graft was used in group B patients including 200 cases. Pure tone audiometry was performed preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. Results The graft uptake rate were more than 90 percent and more than 80 percent in group B respectively at the end of 14 week Conclusion From our study we came to the conclusion that both cartilage shield graft and temporalis fascia graft can be used as graft materials independently in Tympanoplasty. But the results of our study suggest that cartilage shield Tympanoplasty can be considered as the first line treatment in chronic otitis media especially with moderate/large/subtotal perforations with good success rate and hearing improvement.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background Temporalis fascia and cartilage are the most commonly used graft materials, though contradictory reports are available in literature as regards their efficacy in Tympanoplasty. The aim of the study was to compare the graft uptake rates and hearing results in case of temporalis fascia and cartilage in type 1 tympanoplasty Material and Method A total of 400 cases with large, subtotal and total perforation were considered in the study. All the selected patients were divided into two groups. Group A in which temporalis fascia graft was used and including 200 cases and cartilage graft was used in group B patients including 200 cases. Pure tone audiometry was performed preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. Results The graft uptake rate were more than 90 percent and more than 80 percent in group B respectively at the end of 14 week Conclusion From our study we came to the conclusion that both cartilage shield graft and temporalis fascia graft can be used as graft materials independently in Tympanoplasty. But the results of our study suggest that cartilage shield Tympanoplasty can be considered as the first line treatment in chronic otitis media especially with moderate/large/subtotal perforations with good success rate and hearing improvement.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background Temporalis fascia and cartilage are the most commonly used graft materials, though contradictory reports are available in literature as regards their efficacy in Tympanoplasty. The aim of the study was to compare the graft uptake rates and hearing results in case of temporalis fascia and cartilage in type 1 tympanoplasty Material and Method A total of 400 cases with large, subtotal and total perforation were considered in the study. All the selected patients were divided into two groups. Group A in which temporalis fascia graft was used and including 200 cases and cartilage graft was used in group B patients including 200 cases. Pure tone audiometry was performed preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. Results The graft uptake rate were more than 90 percent and more than 80 percent in group B respectively at the end of 14 week Conclusion From our study we came to the conclusion that both cartilage shield graft and temporalis fascia graft can be used as graft materials independently in Tympanoplasty. But the results of our study suggest that cartilage shield Tympanoplasty can be considered as the first line treatment in chronic otitis media especially with moderate/large/subtotal perforations with good success rate and hearing improvement.

Key concepts: Tympanoplasty, Fascia, Medicine, Cartilage, Surgery, Anatomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is Cartilage Shield Tympanoplasty better than Fascia Tympanoplasty — Research Paper | ScholarLens