2024Edward Elgar Publishing eBooksRequires access

Moving the risk perception literature forward to recognize three distinct types of risk perceptions: the tripartite model of travel risk perceptions

Chloe Riley, Lori Pennington-Gray, Ashley Schroeder

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Overall, crises and disasters have increased in the past decade, crises. Many studies that measure risk perceptions in relation to travel and tourism fail to properly conceptualize risk and ground their measures in theory. In order to advance the risk perception literature, theory must underlie and frame effective studies. Risk perceptions have been extended by adopting health theories and constructs. Outside of tourism, literature has advanced risk perceptions to include both cognitive and affective measures. Travel anxiety represents a measure of affective perceptions based upon the risk-as-feelings hypothesis. Travel anxiety and cognitive risk perceptions sum to provide overall risk perceptions. Recently, risk theorists have suggested an additional dimension – experiential risk perceptions. The chapter will outline the need for ongoing collection of risk perception data and how risk perceptions can be based in theory and conceptualized.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Overall, crises and disasters have increased in the past decade, crises. Many studies that measure risk perceptions in relation to travel and tourism fail to properly conceptualize risk and ground their measures in theory. In order to advance the risk perception literature, theory must underlie and frame effective studies. Risk perceptions have been extended by adopting health theories and constructs. Outside of tourism, literature has advanced risk perceptions to include both cognitive and affective measures. Travel anxiety represents a measure of affective perceptions based upon the risk-as-feelings hypothesis. Travel anxiety and cognitive risk perceptions sum to provide overall risk perceptions. Recently, risk theorists have suggested an additional dimension – experiential risk perceptions. The chapter will outline the need for ongoing collection of risk perception data and how risk perceptions can be based in theory and conceptualized.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Overall, crises and disasters have increased in the past decade, crises. Many studies that measure risk perceptions in relation to travel and tourism fail to properly conceptualize risk and ground their measures in theory. In order to advance the risk perception literature, theory must underlie and frame effective studies. Risk perceptions have been extended by adopting health theories and constructs. Outside of tourism, literature has advanced risk perceptions to include both cognitive and affective measures. Travel anxiety represents a measure of affective perceptions based upon the risk-as-feelings hypothesis. Travel anxiety and cognitive risk perceptions sum to provide overall risk perceptions. Recently, risk theorists have suggested an additional dimension – experiential risk perceptions. The chapter will outline the need for ongoing collection of risk perception data and how risk perceptions can be based in theory and conceptualized.

Key concepts: Perception, Risk perception, Psychology, Neuroscience

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Moving the risk perception literature forward to recognize three distinct types of risk perceptions: the tripartite model of travel risk perceptions — Research Paper | ScholarLens