Differences Teach Us More Than Similarities: The Need for Evolutionary Thinking in Comparative Cognition
Stephan A. Reber
Abstract
Open-access reader
Stephan A. Reber
Abstract
Open-access reader
A persistent anthropocentric school of thought prevents comparative cognition from truly joining the evolutionary sciences, which often view "cognition" as an alien subject to the study of life.In this article, I argue that cognition is indeed inherent to all life and that we could study the evolution of cognitive skills like any other species-specific trait if we stop elevating convergence over differences, adopt an inclusive working definition of cognition, and choose new model organisms with a strong focus on phylogeny.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A persistent anthropocentric school of thought prevents comparative cognition from truly joining the evolutionary sciences, which often view "cognition" as an alien subject to the study of life.In this article, I argue that cognition is indeed inherent to all life and that we could study the evolution of cognitive skills like any other species-specific trait if we stop elevating convergence over differences, adopt an inclusive working definition of cognition, and choose new model organisms with a strong focus on phylogeny.
Key concepts: Comparative cognition, Animal cognition, Cognition, Comparative psychology, Animal behavior, Cognitive science, Psychology, Cognitive psychology