Revisiting and comparing the Carnot Cycle and the Otto Cycle
Tiago Kroetz
Abstract
Tiago Kroetz
Abstract
The reversibility of the Carnot Cycle makes it the most efficient thermodynamic cycle to convert energy as heat into work operating between two thermal reservoirs at different temperatures. The Otto cycle represents an idealization of the processes in the spark-ignition 4-stroke internal combustion engine operation. Some aspects of these two crucial thermodynamic cycles will be presented here in a comparative manner. This highlights why the Carnot Cycle does not offer advantages over the Otto Cycle in the operation of real thermal engines when we consider the efficiency and work done per cycle dependent on the compression ratio of the cycles.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The reversibility of the Carnot Cycle makes it the most efficient thermodynamic cycle to convert energy as heat into work operating between two thermal reservoirs at different temperatures. The Otto cycle represents an idealization of the processes in the spark-ignition 4-stroke internal combustion engine operation. Some aspects of these two crucial thermodynamic cycles will be presented here in a comparative manner. This highlights why the Carnot Cycle does not offer advantages over the Otto Cycle in the operation of real thermal engines when we consider the efficiency and work done per cycle dependent on the compression ratio of the cycles.
Key concepts: Carnot cycle, Thermodynamic cycle, Thermal efficiency, Work (physics), Heat engine, Isentropic process, Thermodynamics, Combustion