1998Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and NutritionRequires access

Effect of Formula Supplemented with Docosahexaenoic Acid andγ‐Linolenic Acid on Fatty Acid Status and Visual Acuity in Term Infants

Marianne Hørby Jørgensen, Gunhild Hølmer, Pia Lund, Olle Hernell, Kim F. Michaelsen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Docosahexaenoic acid is present in high concentration in retina and does not influence visual development in preterm infants. It is still under discussion whether docosahexaenoic acid is important for visual development in term infants. Methods: Thirty‐seven infants fed formula for a median of 14 days were randomized at median age of 25 days to three formulas: a) DHAGF: 0.3 wt% docosahexaenoic acid and 0.5 wt% γ‐linolenic acid; b) DHAF 0.3 wt% docosahexaenoic acid; or c) STF: standard formula without long‐chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and 17 breast‐fed infants were observed, using blood samples and anthropometric measurements from 1 to 4 months of age. At 4 months, visual acuity was measured by swept steadystate visual evoked potential. A cross‐sectional study on 25 breast‐fed infants was carried out as a reference group for the analyses. Results: Infants fed the two docosahexaenoic acid‐supplemented formula had relative docosahexaenoic acid concentrations in red blood cell phospholipids almost as high as those in breast‐fed infants, whereas infants in the standard formula group had significantly lower levels. The addition of γ‐linolenic acid to the formula had a positive effect on red blood cell arachidonic acid levels, compared with levels obtained using fish oil only. Visual acuity was significantly different among all feeding groups (analysis of variance;p = 0.05, means ± standard deviation: breast‐fed, 0.37± 0.06 logMAR; DHAF and DHAGF combined, 0.40 ± 0.07 logMAR; and standard formula 0.44 ± 0.07 logMAR. However, there was no statistical difference among the formula groups. In a multiple regression analysis including all formula‐fed infants, weight at delivery (p = 0.002), but not type of formula, was significantly associated with visual acuity at 4 months of age. Conclusions: The addition of docosahexaenoic acid resulted in concentrations in red blood cells at similar levels as those in breast‐fed infants, whereas the increase in visual acuity did not reach significance. The addition ofγ‐linolenic acid resulted in higher arachidonic acid concentrations in red blood cells.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT Background: Docosahexaenoic acid is present in high concentration in retina and does not influence visual development in preterm infants. It is still under discussion whether docosahexaenoic acid is important for visual development in term infants. Methods: Thirty‐seven infants fed formula for a median of 14 days were randomized at median age of 25 days to three formulas: a) DHAGF: 0.3 wt% docosahexaenoic acid and 0.5 wt% γ‐linolenic acid; b) DHAF 0.3 wt% docosahexaenoic acid; or c) STF: standard formula without long‐chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and 17 breast‐fed infants were observed, using blood samples and anthropometric measurements from 1 to 4 months of age. At 4 months, visual acuity was measured by swept steadystate visual evoked potential. A cross‐sectional study on 25 breast‐fed infants was carried out as a reference group for the analyses. Results: Infants fed the two docosahexaenoic acid‐supplemented formula had relative docosahexaenoic acid concentrations in red blood cell phospholipids almost as high as those in breast‐fed infants, whereas infants in the standard formula group had significantly lower levels. The addition of γ‐linolenic acid to the formula had a positive effect on red blood cell arachidonic acid levels, compared with levels obtained using fish oil only. Visual acuity was significantly different among all feeding groups (analysis of variance;p = 0.05, means ± standard deviation: breast‐fed, 0.37± 0.06 logMAR; DHAF and DHAGF combined, 0.40 ± 0.07 logMAR; and standard formula 0.44 ± 0.07 logMAR. However, there was no statistical difference among the formula groups. In a multiple regression analysis including all formula‐fed infants, weight at delivery (p = 0.002), but not type of formula, was significantly associated with visual acuity at 4 months of age. Conclusions: The addition of docosahexaenoic acid resulted in concentrations in red blood cells at similar levels as those in breast‐fed infants, whereas the increase in visual acuity did not reach significance. The addition ofγ‐linolenic acid resulted in higher arachidonic acid concentrations in red blood cells.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Docosahexaenoic acid is present in high concentration in retina and does not influence visual development in preterm infants. It is still under discussion whether docosahexaenoic acid is important for visual development in term infants. Methods: Thirty‐seven infants fed formula for a median of 14 days were randomized at median age of 25 days to three formulas: a) DHAGF: 0.3 wt% docosahexaenoic acid and 0.5 wt% γ‐linolenic acid; b) DHAF 0.3 wt% docosahexaenoic acid; or c) STF: standard formula without long‐chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and 17 breast‐fed infants were observed, using blood samples and anthropometric measurements from 1 to 4 months of age. At 4 months, visual acuity was measured by swept steadystate visual evoked potential. A cross‐sectional study on 25 breast‐fed infants was carried out as a reference group for the analyses. Results: Infants fed the two docosahexaenoic acid‐supplemented formula had relative docosahexaenoic acid concentrations in red blood cell phospholipids almost as high as those in breast‐fed infants, whereas infants in the standard formula group had significantly lower levels. The addition of γ‐linolenic acid to the formula had a positive effect on red blood cell arachidonic acid levels, compared with levels obtained using fish oil only. Visual acuity was significantly different among all feeding groups (analysis of variance;p = 0.05, means ± standard deviation: breast‐fed, 0.37± 0.06 logMAR; DHAF and DHAGF combined, 0.40 ± 0.07 logMAR; and standard formula 0.44 ± 0.07 logMAR. However, there was no statistical difference among the formula groups. In a multiple regression analysis including all formula‐fed infants, weight at delivery (p = 0.002), but not type of formula, was significantly associated with visual acuity at 4 months of age. Conclusions: The addition of docosahexaenoic acid resulted in concentrations in red blood cells at similar levels as those in breast‐fed infants, whereas the increase in visual acuity did not reach significance. The addition ofγ‐linolenic acid resulted in higher arachidonic acid concentrations in red blood cells.

Key concepts: Docosahexaenoic acid, Medicine, Linolenic acid, Visual acuity, Fatty acid, Term (time), alpha-Linolenic acid, Polyunsaturated fatty acid

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of Formula Supplemented with Docosahexaenoic Acid andγ‐Linolenic Acid on Fatty Acid Status and Visual Acuity in Term Infants — Research Paper | ScholarLens